Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 October 14



Template:Hockey linescore

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. delldot  &nabla;.  05:12, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Template hasn't been edited in over a year and is used on no pages. Djsasso (talk) 01:59, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Stifle (talk) 11:53, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Deele, as of DJ's nom.-- Free way  guy  23:55, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, completely unused template, we went with a different method instead. Pparazorback (talk) 01:53, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WPDERM

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. delldot  &nabla;.  05:17, 22 October 2008 (UTC)

Recently created template has been superseded by an expansion of WPMED. It is not used and has no likelihood of ever being used. The development and deletion of this template have been discussed on the task force's talk page at WT:DERM, with no objections to deletion. WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:56, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. As one of the authors, I have no issues with this template being deleted. —Cyclonenim (talk · contribs · email) 06:33, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Stifle (talk) 11:53, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination Kilbad (talk) 17:06, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete and subst, for leftover still living pages.-- Free way  guy  23:56, 20 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment The deletion should also include DermatologyWikiProject, a redirect.  WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:08, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NHL Schedule Start

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete --Philosopher Let us reason together. 20:42, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Template that was created a year ago which was never used as it was intended as WP:HOCKEY ended up going with another format. Djsasso (talk) 01:50, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Template can be modified to the format that WP:HOCKEY uses. Fbdave (talk) 00:51, 15 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep, a very useful template.-- Free way  guy  23:56, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * As mentioned its used on no pages, and a different layout is now used, no need for this layout template. -Djsasso (talk) 05:21, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, completely unused template, we went with a different method instead. Pparazorback (talk) 01:53, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NHL Schedule End

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete --Philosopher Let us reason together. 20:43, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Template that was created a year ago which was never used as it was intended as WP:HOCKEY ended up going with another format. Djsasso (talk) 01:50, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Template can be modified to the format that WP:HOCKEY uses. Fbdave (talk) 00:51, 15 October 2008 (UTC)


 * keep as of above.-- Free way  guy  23:57, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * As mentioned its used on no pages, and a different layout is now used, no need for this layout template. -Djsasso (talk) 05:21, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, completely unused template, we went with a different method instead. Pparazorback (talk) 01:53, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NHL Schedule Entry

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Delete --Philosopher Let us reason together. 20:43, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Template that was created a year ago which was never used as it was intended as WP:HOCKEY ended up going with another format. Djsasso (talk) 01:50, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Template can be modified to the format that WP:HOCKEY uses. Fbdave (talk) 00:50, 15 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep, as of above.-- Free way  guy  23:57, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
 * As mentioned its used on no pages, and a different layout is now used, no need for this layout template. -Djsasso (talk) 05:21, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, completely unused template, we went with a different method instead. Pparazorback (talk) 01:53, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.