Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 September 14



Template:Jeff Deyo

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was keep --WoohookittyWoohoo! 07:27, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

I don't see what this template is doing. ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 21:55, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep It's linking a bunch of articles together to ease navigation between the articles. That's the positive purpose. Pie is good   (Apple is the best)  23:31, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep This template definitely serves a purpose. Having all the Jeff Deyo-related articles on one template is helpful. Neelix (talk) 16:32, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Urban Bus Route in Busan, Korea

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete --WoohookittyWoohoo! 07:29, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Template full of red links to non-notable bus routes. The articles created have been prodded by multiple editors citing WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Somno (talk) 09:10, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Most (if not all) of the article as non-notable and (baring something crazy happening) never will be. ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 21:57, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. As nom noted, the articles are just listings of bus stops and will likely be deleted shortly (even though the author continues to create them...). justinfr (talk/contribs) 11:54, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, few if any of the redlinks will ever point at valid articles. Very limited usefulness.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 10:37, 16 September 2008 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:apple fair use

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Speedy delete per CSD:G7. Stifle (talk) 11:21, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Generic rationale that doesn't appear to be used anywhere and is too generic to be relevant and specific, complying with the fair use rationale guidelines. Stifle (talk) 14:58, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as creator Silly idea constructed on a whim, as if image copyrights weren't messy enough. Get rid of it.--HereToHelp (talk to me) 15:35, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.