Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 September 19



Template:ABS-CBN Media Franchised Shows

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete --WoohookittyWoohoo! 08:34, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

A template that simply brags about ABS-CBN's foreign franchise programs, similar to the already-deleted template of similar nature from a rival station. Starczamora (talk) 23:28, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Starczamora, Template isn't notable. 121.96.120.21 (talk) 11:43, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom; template isn't notable, besides, the other template of the other station was already deleted. Xeltran (talk) 11:54, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Education in Estonia

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Wizardman 11:57, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Loops ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 22:16, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Looks like someone got confused. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 07:43, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Tallinna Lasnamäe Gümnaasium

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Wizardman 11:58, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Does nothing. ErikTheBikeMan (talk) 22:15, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Looks like someone got confused trying to create Tallinna Lasnamäe Gümnaasium (which I've tagged for speedy, as it's empty). Zetawoof(&zeta;) 07:43, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Grupo musical

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. Wizardman 11:59, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Unused template that loops on itself. I'm somewhat confused by the whole thing, so please let me know if this is incorrect.  TN ‑  X   - Man  17:45, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, as above except for Katharzys (already deleted as "non-notable"). Zetawoof(&zeta;) 07:44, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Bayer Leverkusen Squad of the Century

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete delldot   &nabla;.  20:34, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Unnecessary subjective template with no references. --Jimbo[online] 13:22, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. POV, OR. -- Alexf42 13:34, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Alexf E  P  21:42, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 * It is hardly Original Research if it's officially put out by the club. matt91486 (talk) 01:05, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I see no evidence that the club produced this "Team of the Century" list. – PeeJay 15:46, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * It's mentioned (but unreferenced) at Bayer 04 Leverkusen. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 10:56, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
 * This link says it was determined by an internet poll of over 4000 fans. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 19:04, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Incubator

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was keep. Wizardman 12:00, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Prior TfD at 14 Aug 2006

Unnecessary self-reference. While links to articles on another wiki are useful, incubator wiki will change as projects are tested and rejected. Also, it promotes another project, not just anther version of an article. Possibly an interlingual link on the side would be more appropriate.  MBisanz  talk 16:44, 11 September 2008 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WoohookittyWoohoo! 11:09, 19 September 2008 (UTC) --WoohookittyWoohoo! 11:09, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

No, it ís useful. People speaking that language can find out that there is a test project via en.wiki then. They then can help with setting it up or review the accuracy of the test-project. --OosWesThoesBes (talk) 16:02, 26 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. Useful template. —Guy Peters Talk • Contributions • Edit counter 12:58, 27 September 2008 (UTC)


 *  Keep. Extremely useful, as it shows people who may know the language that there is a test project there.  If a test project is rejected, the template can be easily removed from an article page.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.10.77.101 (talk) 19:11, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.