Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 September 26



Template:KeptDRV

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was deleted Template:KeptDRV per Templates for deletion/Log/2008 September 22, deleted Template:Keptdrv, a redirect to it. delldot  &nabla;.  21:32, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Unused DRV template created by sockpuppet. (Would an admin please post  at User talk:Solumeiras. The notice is for others reviewing that talk page and not so much for the blocked user. Thanks) -- Suntag  ☼  14:11, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * There's also Template:Keptdrv, which is a redirect to the above. Cheers.  lifebaka++ 16:37, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Pink singles

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete delldot   &nabla;.  00:02, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

There is no reason for this to exist. There is already a Pink template and this is all duplicate information. eo (talk) 13:41, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Duplicate template used in only one page. Eklipse (talk) 05:56, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ligat ha'Al 2009/10 table

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete delldot   &nabla;.  00:17, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Violation of WP:CRYSTAL; the season will begin in a year. Further, no articles link to this template. Hockey-holic (talk) 11:41, 26 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, as the template is currently not used and will not be used for another year. Hockey-holic (talk) 11:46, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Allie Jean Dimeco

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete. delldot  &nabla;.  00:24, 4 October 2008 (UTC)



A template created by a new user apparently duplicating the article Allie DiMeco. Sandy Georgia (Talk) 01:00, 26 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete (and fix the instructions for the TfD page, which are impossible to follow, even for an experienced user). Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 01:01, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, speedily if possible. Clearly this was never supposed to be a template and was placed in templatespace erroneously. I'm not sure what the problems with the TfD instructions are; if you can revise them while keeping the meaning the same, please be bold and do so. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:45, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I think I figured them out now. The instructions say not to subst, but show a subst, and they have a whole lot of extra brackets.  They don't say you only need to put  . If that is correct, I hope someone will fix, because I fiddled forever to try to make this nom.  Sandy Georgia  (Talk) 03:25, 28 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:24CleanupFlag

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was delete --WoohookittyWoohoo! 09:51, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

I don't see why this WikiProject should have its own cleanup tags, and I don't think it's a good precedent. delldot  &nabla;.  01:51, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree with deletion. Maybe it is a way for the project to control its progress. But I think a list in the project page is much better than having different templates, difficult for people not participating in the project to add or handle. -- Magioladitis (talk) 09:56, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Semi Support. Perhaps if the 24 WP needs the template in order to populate their internal cleanup category, they could just use a null template to quickly add the cat? Prince of Canadat 00:43, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * One of the people participating in the project wrote above and said they don't need them anymore. All other templates used by the project are to delete. -- Magioladitis (talk) 10:16, 4 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. WikiProjects are better off using the templates already set up. If anybody is unhappy about this templates deletion, lets simply tell them "deal with it". Mythdon (talk) 07:49, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - If they are used responsibly they they provie a level of specificity whihc may be missed by the standard templates.--Lucy-marie (talk) 09:48, 6 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Lucy-marie, you do not understand the redundancy of this template. You obviously are not familiar with why templates should be nominated here. See Templates_for_deletion for more. Mythdon (talk) 09:54, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Just copying from above: "Magioladitis is correct, that is the reason they were originally created. I am the current project leader and I agree these aren't necessary - it's just the same template as but with a 24 logo basically. There's three other ones  that should also be converted over to the standard cleanup tags and then deleted. SeanMooney (talk) 23:25, 3 October 2008 (UTC)" -- Magioladitis (talk) 10:27, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Is this response to me or Lucy-marie?. Mythdon (talk) 10:46, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * To Lucy-Marie of course. :) -- Magioladitis (talk) 10:48, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Was you trying to give out a better explanation for Lucy-marie than my explanation?. Mythdon (talk) 10:50, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * To support your explanation. -- Magioladitis (talk) 10:59, 6 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per main contributor's (SeanMooney) request. This templates is redudant to cleanup.nips (talk) 17:46, 6 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Upmerge functionality per my comments here. -- Ned Scott 22:31, 6 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.