Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 April 1



Template:NBA teams organization

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 05:39, 9 April 2009 (UTC)



Single use template. It is only useful at the National Basketball Association article. It used to be transcluded to that article, though another editor as since subst'ed it there, thus it currently is used nowhere. Resolute 13:45, 1 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Single use templates are not acceptable, and since its not used anywhere it should be deleted. -Djsasso (talk) 15:29, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete since all the content can be placed in the National Basketball Association article.— Chris!  c t 19:01, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. All info is in the National Basketball Association article, so the template doesn't even need to be substituted.  --fuzzy510 (talk) 17:51, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Since I am the creator and I now think that this should be deleted, can an admin speedy closed this?— Chris!  c t 22:35, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Not really, since you don't own the template. Anyway, consensus indicates it will be deleted soon. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:49, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Not used anywhere else. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:49, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:!

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. JPG-GR (talk) 05:44, 2 April 2009 (UTC)



Really not useful. Typing | is so much harder than just typing |. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheJosh (talk • contribs) 00:21, April 1, 2009


 * Redirect to Factorial. JPG-GR (talk) 01:31, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep reading the template documentation is helpful in determining why things exist. 76.66.193.69 (talk) 04:43, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Whatever. tleSif (atlk) 08:08, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, speedy close and trout nom. 3 million+ transclusions and essential for template coding. Did we read the documentation before nominating this? PC78 (talk) 10:20, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Bugger, it's the 1st of April isn't it? :-D PC78 (talk) 10:28, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.