Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 April 19



Template:ShojoStar

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 18:28, 27 April 2009 (UTC)



This award template was created by a Korean account which attempted to unilaterally to add it to WP:ANIME without any discussion. The WikiProject already has two awards: the BarnSakura for anime and manga related article improvements, and the BarnLoli for project related improvements. This award unnecessarily duplicates the former and creates confusion. Farix (Talk) 22:43, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, unnecessary and seemingly pointless. Same creator of this made a "personal" portal as well, which was also deleted. This seems like just another personal creation with no purpose/function.-- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 23:02, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Pointless. — sephiroth bcr  ( converse ) 22:37, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, pointless award template created without discussion. 「ダイノ ガイ 千 ？！」(Dinoguy1000) 19:20, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ugly. --erachima talk 06:44, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Concept product

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 18:28, 27 April 2009 (UTC)



Only used in one article; pointless; not a temporal template (concept products may stay concept products for all eternity), so it shouldn't exist even if it were a useful template. --Conti|✉ 19:33, 19 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Superfluous. Text and citations better describe the nature of the article than the template. Not usefully a temporal template, as many more concept products are never produced than actually make it to mass production. Yet another example of a template copied from template current. -- Yellowdesk (talk) 00:30, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unnecessary. Garion96 (talk) 20:22, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.