Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 July 1



July 1

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Peter Symonds ( talk ) 20:37, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Template:TheAngryBeavers


Redundant to the main article which already offers navigation to other related articles, there's only two articles directly relating to this series and it's unlikely to expand given the series ended in 2001. treelo radda  08:49, 23 June 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 06:35, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:500 saves club

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis (talk) 05:57, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Template is pointless, considering there are only 2 members of this exclusive club and there will only be 2 members for a number of years. Furthermore, the information in this template is a subset of the much more valuable List of Major League Baseball all-time saves leaders article. Lastly, an article was created to duplicate the content of this template as well. Neither one is needed. This is an example of over-templatization. Y2kcrazyjoker4 (talk) 21:51, 1 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete only two people, pointless--Yankees10 01:12, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Minimal utility with only two people. No potential for future growth for a number of years. - Masonpatriot (talk) 01:14, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I concur, though 300 saves might be a justifiable cutoff. --Muboshgu (talk) 20:03, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No sense in having this with only two players. Adam Penale (talk) 21:01, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.