Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 July 29



Template:Rhain C

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis (talk) 00:06, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Vanity template about the shows User:Rhain c likes, I think? It's used only in an article about a book which is certainly of the template creator's own creation. -- SonicAD (talk) 23:33, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, unused. Svick (talk) 20:09, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:The Lion King family

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis (talk) 09:41, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Useless "template" that provides an WP:OR ridden "family tree" for characters in The Lion King that is not used nor usable in any particular fashion. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 23:24, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. per WP:OR, above. -- RUL3R *flaming 18:34, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unnecessary. -- Victor talk 06:14, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Universal Century ship classes

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_ Zero 13:18, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Article were merged into a single list. Template is no longer needed. Farix (Talk) 14:03, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete The merge is done so no more use for that template. --KrebMarkt 14:11, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - template no longer needed. —Quasirandom (talk) 15:47, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - too few articles to justify a navbox. Alternatively, broaden into a general Mobile Suit Gundam (original series, not whole franchise) navbox, if one doesn't already exist (and if it does, it needs to be moved to Template:Mobile Suit Gundam). 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 18:12, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:16char

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete as orphaned and per recent discussions on the plentiful 1632-related templates. JPG-GR (talk) 17:51, 4 August 2009 (UTC)



Along with the obvious fact that every usage could be replaced with a simple wikilink, the split of 1632 characters into List of 1632 characters and List of 1632 characters (fictional) and changing the headings from Last Name, First Name to First Name Last Name means that every link using this template is now, at best, to the right article broken as to the section and, at worst, the wrong article completely. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:28, 29 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, per nom, inappropriate use of template space. Axem Titanium (talk) 14:47, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete — This is one of the core bits of this inappropriate template cloud. Per Ricky ;) Cheers, Jack Merridew 05:48, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom. I also added two identical templates to this discussion, which should be uncontroversial as they are identical and basically orphaned. Plastikspork (talk) 22:06, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Publication order table

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete all Magioladitis (talk) 08:08, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Along with its subtemplates, its only use is for display purposes at the bottom of template pages like Template:1632counts maintenance links and Template:1632 series publications count. Templates should not be used to create a walled garden of the template documentation and updating system. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:17, 29 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, per nom, inappropriate use of template space. Axem Titanium (talk) 14:47, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete All as above. Sincerely, Jack Merridew 05:50, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Chinese actress and singer

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_ Zero 13:10, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Article misplaced in template-space. LeSnail (talk) 04:45, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Subst and delete, per nom, inappropriate use of template space. Axem Titanium (talk) 14:47, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Not subst, replace with Infobox person. -- Magioladitis (talk) 09:32, 30 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete, replace with Template:Infobox Person and review that article as well. I think everything composed in that template is the actual article, so notability needs to be checked, methinks. -- Victor talk 06:13, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - Replace the one usage with infobox musician. Garion96 (talk) 13:22, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Substitute and delete. Inappropriate use of template space. Replaceable with Template:Infobox Chinese-language singer and actor. Jafeluv (talk) 14:19, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.