Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 June 17



Template:Timber Jerry

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deleted by User:DragonflySixtyseven. JPG-GR (talk) 19:31, 18 June 2009 (UTC)



Redlink-filled template which isn't of use. Fences &amp;  Windows  17:57, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Wrongtitlecat

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 01:33, 3 July 2009 (UTC)



Unused, superfluous duplication of Template:Wrongtitle. —Remember the dot (talk) 01:21, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect as many other category templates use "cat" 70.29.212.226 (talk) 08:10, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete – While there are other category templates with "cat" in the title, I don't see this as being a useful redirect because of that. The template is not transcluded on any categories, and the incoming links are all due to a link from a transcluded template (Template messages) and so can be easily removed. –B LACK F ALCON  (T ALK ) 17:32, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.