Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 September 19



Template:Spanish comarca flag and arms

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete

Unknown purpose. Unused Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 20:09, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unused and seemingly abandoned, with no edits for three years. --RL0919 (talk) 03:04, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. For what it's worth, a comarca would be an ideal candidate for infobox settlement.  81.110.104.91 (talk) 16:41, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Show1

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete as unused or redundant to.

Mostly unused. Aparently useless. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 20:05, 19 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment Isn't this used in the Help system and template documentation? It seems alot of templates used in documentation and help have been deleted at TfD... So the help pages work rather poorly because of it. 76.66.196.139 (talk) 03:00, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - basically unused, no obvious purpose that I can see. Robofish (talk) 13:07, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Swimming in Germany

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete

Redlinks! Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 19:58, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unused and not enough non-redlink articles to justify a navbox. --RL0919 (talk) 17:30, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - not needed at this time. Robofish (talk) 13:05, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Watch2

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete

Unused and redundant with watch. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 19:44, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Seems to be just an unprotected version of }. Unused and seemingly abandoned, with no edits since 2007 and no talk discussions. --RL0919 (talk) 17:33, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Wikimedia2

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete

Seems completely redundant with Sisterlinks. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 19:34, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The whole point of the template is to eliminate the Wikispecies link. You'll find nothing about Abraham Lincoln or Moscow or the Space Shuttle on Wikispecies, so why post a template inviting readers to click over to them for more information? BD2412  T 19:52, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * sisterlinks has wikispecies link automatically off. Read the doc. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 23:53, 19 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - redundant per Locos epraix. Robofish (talk) 13:03, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:IDRIVEtopic

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirect

The template has been de facto empty (nothing outside ) since February. The  content is very similar to ACIDcur. Svick (talk) 18:03, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to ACIDcur - seems redundant to that template. Robofish (talk) 13:05, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant. No reason to redirect. -- Magioladitis (talk) 22:43, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Closed Lines

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis (talk) 22:42, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Delete Template is very specific (it refers to three railway lines in Canada) and it is currently unused. Hertzsprung (talk) 17:53, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unused and unedited for the past year. --RL0919 (talk) 18:55, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I created it and it is indeed unused and has been superseded. Well spotted. BTW it's Australian. MrHarper (talk) 04:47, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:US statements

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis (talk) 22:41, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Extremely subjective and fairly useless. Delete. Neutralitytalk 07:27, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - while there are plenty of sources out there that will describe certain statements as "historic", there isn't a clear line, and to make one here is subjective judgment. 81.110.104.91 (talk) 08:51, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. The talk page and edit history show the POV problems with this template. --RL0919 (talk) 17:09, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. There is no clear definition for this template, which has led to (and will continue to lead to) violations of POV and V. Two previous AfD saw extremely weak motions to keep win, chiefly because very few editors noticed them.  It is an embarrassment to WP that this Template has lingered for as long as it has. 271828182 (talk) 07:28, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.