Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2009 September 26



Template:Exploding organisms

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete by db-author Magioladitis (talk) 22:36, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

only about animals not organisms in general. 3^0$0%0 1@!k (0#1®!%$ 20:49, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
 * closed Ikip (talk) 21:59, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Heroes roster

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete

Inappropriate and orphan. If really needed somewhere just subst it. Magioladitis (talk) 18:33, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - unused, and an inappropriate use of templates. Robofish (talk) 01:37, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Delete - It is used on the baseball team's page (Heroes (baseball)). Every Minor and Major League Baseball team, as well as many international teams (Korea, China, etc.), have templates just like this. -NatureBoyMD (talk) 00:28, 28 September 2009 (UTC) Changed my vote based on it being a duplication of Template:Woori Heroes roster -NatureBoyMD (talk) 16:25, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. It is an appropriate use of a template, as most baseball teams have such templates, not just for use in the article on the team, but also in the articles of the players and coaches listed. However, this is a redundant, misnamed template to this one, which is at the full name of the team (Korean teams are named for their sponsors), and is the one used on the team's article.oknazevad (talk) 15:36, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Vladonai Software

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete

Spam. Speedy? Andy Mabbett (User: Pigsonthewing ); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 17:21, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Only use of this template was in a misguided attempt to create a company-specific infobox, and the creator's now blocked. Useless. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 18:30, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Maybe the creator intended a userbox as mentioned by Zetawoof, but the actual output is just article text, which is not an appropriate use of a template. So it is useless for what was intended and undesirable for what it is. --RL0919 (talk) 14:59, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Explosive

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Magioladitis (talk) 22:38, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Unused. Marked as deprecated since October 2008. Andy Mabbett (User: Pigsonthewing ); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 16:57, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Address-embed

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 15:57, 3 October 2009 (UTC)



Unused; transcludes } (see below). Andy Mabbett (User: Pigsonthewing ); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 10:38, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Address

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 15:56, 3 October 2009 (UTC)



User experiment with microformat markup; providing functionality better obtained through coordinates, using Coord}. Unused Used on ~22 articles only, where it should be replaced with plain text. Andy Mabbett (User:Pigsonthewing); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 00:16, 18 September 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JPG-GR (talk) 02:40, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as obsolete, deprecated in favor of . All instances of usage need to be replaced/fixed however.. as it is in use in some high profile articles like Chrysler Building. -- &oelig; &trade; 20:54, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep or possibly replace with simpler User:Coldacid/Templates/mf-adr. While coordinates might be better for pinpointing something on a map, there are times when you need to state an actual address. Removing support for standalone marked-up addresses is not helpful. --coldacid (talk|contrib) 04:24, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * We undoubtedly need some form of template for inline addresses; but this isn't it. Your sandbox template looks promising; I'd be happy to work on that with you. Andy Mabbett (User: Pigsonthewing ); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 08:16, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Were you aware that coord has support for inline as well: "display=inline"? -- &oelig; &trade; 01:53, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Except that coord does geo, not adr. --coldacid (talk|contrib) 03:44, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Andy, what are you considering? I keep mf-adr in userspace, but it's already being used in a few pages. Suggestions probably better to put on its own talk page, though. --coldacid (talk|contrib) 03:47, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Replying elsewhere. Andy Mabbett (User: Pigsonthewing ); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 16:31, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * I'm changing my vote to Delete and replace with a more tightly defined, specific template. I still believe that a template for street addresses, seperate from hCards, is needed. However, Address isn't it. --coldacid (talk|contrib) 04:02, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.