Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2009 December 1



Template:Silicon Valley Football Classic

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete

Navbox to direct to all redlinks. Can easily be recreated once there's something to navigate to. fuzzy510 (talk) 22:57, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete unless someone creates the articles before this closes. Since the template has been around since February, I'm guessing that is unlikely. --RL0919 (talk) 04:38, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:RTD-WritersTale

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete

Hard-coded, used on three pages Svick (talk) 22:11, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Subst and delete. Hardcoded instances of another template can be speedy deleted per WP:CSD. --RL0919 (talk) 04:40, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I thought T3 doesn't apply here, because the template is employed in a useful fashion on those three articles. Svick (talk) 09:09, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Subst and delete per the above. ╟─ Treasury Tag ►  sundries  ─╢ 06:55, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Subst and delete: used it around a year ago to make citing some stuff easier; not really needed now. Sceptre (talk) 09:36, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Sanctity

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete

Unnecessary template; consider read WP:NAVBOX.  C  anniba loki  20:29, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not enough links for a useful navbox. --RL0919 (talk) 04:31, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. There's practically nothing to navigate in this navbox. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 05:43, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2008–09 WHL Goaltending leaders

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete

No article uses this template, and there is only one article it would be relevant on which means a template is not needed. The information is out of date so I did not include it on the one page that it could have been merged onto. DJSasso (talk) 18:42, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom as an obsolete template -Pparazorback (talk) 01:55, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cite Research Publication

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete

Parameters already included in Template:Cite conference; lacks coding, usage summary, parameter description, etc. momo  ricks  00:57, 24 November 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 04:18, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. It's not even properly coded to work, and if it were it would be redundant to other citation templates. --RL0919 (talk) 04:42, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:R uncategorized

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete per Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009_November_15 and no other objections. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 00:05, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Category:Uncategorized redirects has been deleted so it no longer serves a purpose. Cenarium (talk) 21:54, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Has WikiProject_Redirect or the creator Lenoxus been notified? -MornMore (talk) 11:46, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
 * They were notified of the discussion for Category:Uncategorized redirects where I mentioned the template. Cenarium (talk) 23:44, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 04:12, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Kambojas

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus to delete

The links in the nav bar are mostly to redirects to one main article within the nav bar and a couple of others. Better served by links in the See also section. Also see this AfD for an article in this group. Delete - Spaceman  Spiff  05:13, 21 November 2009 (UTC) <hr style="width:50%;" /> Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 04:10, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - even if Migration of Kambojas is deleted, this template would still link five articles (Kambojas, Kamboja (name), Location of the Kamboja Kingdom, Kambojas in Indian literature and Kambojas (Mahabharata)). That's usually enough for a navigational template. There are also other articles that could be added, such as Kamboj in ancient inscriptions and Kamboja Kingdom. Robofish (talk) 21:24, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.