Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2009 November 4



Template:Spectrobes

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete - no objections.

Only navigates five articles —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:06, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not enough links to justify a navbox. If new material continues to be produced, could recreate in the future when there are more articles. --RL0919 (talk) 16:35, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Eutechnyx games

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. 03:29, 12 November 2009 (UTC)



Only really navigates two articles —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:35, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. The current version does not have enough links for a useful navbox, but the list of games at Eutechnyx shows over a dozen with articles. It should be possible to expand the navbox with these. --RL0919 (talk) 15:28, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I've expanded the template to include all games where the game's article gives Eutechnyx as the main developer. There are other games where they are listed as co-developers that could also be added. I will wait to see the outcome of this discussion before adding the template to any more articles. --RL0919 (talk) 00:34, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Province Thailand

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete and replace - no objections.

Convert to Template:Infobox province/settlement. No need for a seperate template. Himalayan   14:20, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete and replace with Infobox province. There is nothing in this template (special terminology, etc.) that isn't handled by the more widely used generic template. --RL0919 (talk) 16:33, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Dead Rising

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete - Th1rt3en doesn't appear to be objecting, at least not very hard.

Only navigates four articles —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:38, 4 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Question: Is there a necessary minimum? TH 1 RT 3 EN talk ♦ contribs 17:42, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * There is no defined requirement, but in my experience if the number of links is five or less, the consensus is usually to delete them, or occasionally to merge them with a related template. As the number of links (to distinct, existing articles, not redirects or redlinks) rises, so do the chances of the template's survival. (Up to a point. Very large templates also draw deletion !votes.) --RL0919 (talk) 18:43, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not enough links to justify a navbox. If new material continues to be produced, it could be recreated later when there are more articles. --RL0919 (talk) 16:31, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.