Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 August 15



Template:WikiProject Saint Thomas Christians

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per WP:CSD. The template is used on a few talk pages, but it appears those placements were made by the nominator, and the WikiProject has no other participants. RL0919 (talk) 01:34, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Author requests deletion. Not used, nor is project active. Student7 (talk) 21:44, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Assuming nomination statement is accurate then template serves no useful purpose.--EchetusXe 18:00, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Goldsworth Park Rangers F.C. squad

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 07:00, 22 August 2010 (UTC)



Squad navbox for a team which isn't even notable itself, hence the template is not transcluded onto any articles and is never going to be of any use. Big Dom  19:28, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Delete Nowhere close to being a worthwhile template.--EchetusXe 20:35, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Delete Goldsworth Park Rangers don't even have an article, it redirects to Surrey & Hants Border Football League Division 4, hardly notable WilliamF1two (talk) 21:22, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Delete. One redirect and a lot of useless text. Totally unnecessary on every level. Alzarian16 (talk) 21:34, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Delete. One of the most pointless templates I've ever seen. Bretonbanquet (talk) 21:39, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:AR Camp Facilities

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 00:34, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Almost entirely redlinked template. One article is up for AFD and the other is currently A7'd. There is almost no chance that any of these will ever have articles. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:47, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Delete. Full of redlinks, with only one article left, possibly not for very long. Can be restored if some of the redlinks are filled. Alzarian16 (talk) 22:11, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Delete per both of the above. Airplaneman  ✈  19:11, 19 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Per nom. Joaquin008  ( talk ) 20:38, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Formula One teams 2009

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 06:58, 22 August 2010 (UTC)



I believe this template is unnecessary. WP:F1 convention is to have a single "teams and drivers" template, which is updated every year, not a separate template for every season. Consider that if we had a separate template for every season, the Michael Schumacher article would include 17 such templates and the Scuderia Ferrari article would include 61 of them. In addition, the teams and drivers which competed in each season are already listed in the relevant season summary article. DH85868993 (talk) 15:25, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Delete per nom. As DH notes, the number of these templates would rapidly get out of hand and the information is available via other means. I note that there is a similar template for the cars that competed in a given F1 season. However, most F1 cars compete for only one or two seasons, with a very few competing for longer (seven seasons is the record, I believe), so there is much less opportunity for articles to become swamped by templates. 4u1e (talk) 16:17, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Delete. This information is already covered by other articles and their various accompanying tables. The point made by others that, by this token, some articles would include literally dozens of templates is a potent case for deletion. Bretonbanquet (talk) 16:55, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Cs-wolves (talk)  19:59, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Delete per nom. We don't need 60 of these. --Falcadore (talk) 23:39, 19 August 2010 (UTC) Delete. I'm going to have to concede defeat here. Although this was created under WP:BB, I see that it is both unnecessary and inefficient. Thanks. WilliamF1two (talk) 21:15, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Various motorsport season link templates

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 06:56, 22 August 2010 (UTC)



All template transclusions have recently been changed to the more generic Motorsport season, so now these no longer in use on articles. WOSlinker (talk) 08:16, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom. DH85868993 (talk) 09:39, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all. If they are not being used, then they can go. Bretonbanquet (talk) 16:56, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom. Cs-wolves  (talk)  19:59, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom. WilliamF1two (talk) 21:18, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.