Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 August 31



Template:AMGcite

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 15:53, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Only used in four articles. Redundant to cite web. PC78 (talk) 23:18, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant to cite web. Joaquin008 ( talk ) 15:30, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. We have Google maps, Yahoo maps and Bing maps, which demonstrates that there's value in source-specific citation templates sometimes, but in this case, it's not used widely, so it's not likely to be missed if completely orphaned and deleted.  Imzadi  1979   →  03:56, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, having looked at this template again I concede that it is potentially useful, though I don't know how often Allmusic is cited to really say for sure. If kept, a namechange to either Allmusic cite or Cite Allmusic would probably be a good idea. PC78 (talk) 15:56, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * On further reflection I do see the merit in this template, even if it is only used in just a few articles. If possible I would like to withdraw this nomination. PC78 (talk) 15:38, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Full House season 1

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 02:51, 8 September 2010 (UTC)



Unused and unlikely to be used since the individual episodes do not have individual articles. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 23:09, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per nominator: more than 2/3rds of the articles are red linked, and the others are redirects to List of Full House episodes. Battleaxe9872  Talk 23:13, 31 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NENAN.  Imzadi  1979   →  03:56, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:AMG Artist

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 02:53, 8 September 2010 (UTC)



Only 67 No transclusions, redundant to and replaceable with the much more widely used Allmusic. AMG Artist has different parameter names, but for the sake of so few transclusions it's probably not worth the bother of adding them to the other template. A straightforward replace and delete should suffice. PC78 (talk) 21:57, 31 August 2010 (UTC)


 * No objection here, provided a robot or someone with time on their hands will update the articles where it is used. TJRC (talk) 22:14, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Boldly done. All uses of this template have now been replaced with allmusic. PC78 (talk) 23:14, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Then I boldly change my limp "no objection here" to a firm Delete. TJRC (talk) 00:04, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as superseded and orphaned.  Imzadi  1979   →  03:56, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Uniform polyhedra navigator

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was on Templates_for_discussion/Log/2010_September_9. Ruslik_ Zero 16:12, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Polyhedra pages are awash with templates and we don't need yet another one. This one is curious in that its implying some sort of sequence to the polyhedron and the rational behind this ordering is not obvious. Salix (talk): 21:56, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Edmonton Oilers staff

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 02:54, 8 September 2010 (UTC)



A template full of non-notable people. Is there really a reason for this template other than a collection of every single employee for the Oilers? Probably not. Much more of a fancruft template than anything else, and does not contribute to the quality of any article, nor do much to inform of anything but random employees working for a professional team. The team is noteworthy; not the mostly non-notable staff. Jmlk 1  7  20:29, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Template cruft. -DJSasso (talk) 20:33, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Even if you trim the non-notable people, it is still a single use template. Resolute 21:08, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Dbrodbeck (talk) 12:16, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Joaquin008 ( talk ) 15:29, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per above.  Imzadi  1979   →  03:56, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Transport by country

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Close. The author was not notified. Ruslik_ Zero 16:01, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Redundant, many handmade links, Template:Asia topic, Template:Europe topic, Template:Africa topic etc are better to handle this. TruckCard (talk) 12:20, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I pity the guy/gal who made it but reader's and as well as editor's comfort is more important. Template:Asia topic, Template:Europe topic and Template:Africa topic are much better. Farjad 0322 (talk&#124;contribs) 19:37, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Kansas state footballseasons - Template:Kansas State Wildcats football seasons
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete all. Ruslik_ Zero 16:06, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

All are unused, and redundant to various parts of Template:KansasStatefootball, these may even fit the criteria for Speedy Deletion. EmanWilm (talk) 04:37, 31 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per CSD T3.  Imzadi  1979   →  03:56, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.