Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 January 11



Template:Gowikichat

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted by. –B LACK F ALCON  (T ALK ) 00:39, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

No pages linking to the template except author's subpage. Template:Wikichat by same author is taken also to TfD. Template basically tells people to go continue their talking to Wikia instead of Wikipedia.  Ilyushka ☃  Talk!Contribs 21:06, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm the creator of the template and I agree to its deletion from the Template namespace. I should have left it in my User namespace until the WikiChat project gained traction; if that ever happens (which I doubt), then I might consider restoring it in Template, but that won't be any time soon.  T RANSPORTER M AN  ( TALK ) 21:43, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy then. Debresser (talk) 22:03, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NRHPdts

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete —EncMstr (talk) 20:17, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Does the same thing as Template:dts. No mainspace articles link to it anymore. Dudemanfellabra (talk) 20:36, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, I'm an active member of the NRHP wikiproject, and I've never noticed it until now, when I observed Dudeman removing it from a few articles on my watchlist. No point in having a rarely-used template that does exactly the same thing as a frequently-used template.  Nyttend (talk) 21:58, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:NRHP isn't using this any more.  --Elkman (Elkspeak) 19:17, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox nrhp map

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete —EncMstr (talk) 20:17, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Early fork of Template:Infobox NRHP that would allow maps. Now that Infobox NRHP has that function, this is superfluous. No mainspace articles link to it. Dudemanfellabra (talk) 20:14, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:NRHP isn't using this any more, either.  --Elkman (Elkspeak) 19:17, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox nrhp2

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete —EncMstr (talk) 20:17, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Currently a redirect to Template:Infobox NRHP. Zero namespace articles still link to it, and it is no longer needed by WP:NRHP. Dudemanfellabra (talk) 20:09, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. This was just experimentation at WP:NRHP.  --Elkman (Elkspeak) 19:17, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox nrhp3

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete —EncMstr (talk) 20:17, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Outdated template no longer in use. Replaced by the sandbox/testcases system of Template:Infobox NRHP. Dudemanfellabra (talk) 19:57, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. This was just experimentation at WP:NRHP.  --Elkman (Elkspeak) 19:17, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Wikichat

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted under criterion G7 (author requests deletion) by. –B LACK F ALCON  (T ALK ) 00:36, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

A spam invitation to visit the user's Wikia homepage, put on article talk pages encouraging people to "come talk at my website". Sherurcij (speaker for the dead) 18:06, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm the creator of the template and I agree to its deletion from the Template namespace. I should have left it in my User namespace until the WikiChat project gained traction; if that ever happens (which I doubt), then I might consider restoring it in Template, but that won't be any time soon. I disagree with the characterization that it is spam, but for now that's not worth discussing.  T RANSPORTER M AN  ( TALK ) 21:34, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * So this is a speedy now. Debresser (talk) 22:03, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:List of WWE Raw Guest Hosts

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete —EncMstr (talk) 20:17, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

WP:FANCRUFT, adds nothing to the pages that it is being added to, for the most part their participating in WWF is an extremely minute point in their careers. J04n(talk page) 17:23, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:CLT: "Ask yourself, is the subject of this box something that would be mentioned on every article in it? If the answer is 'no', a category or list is probably more appropriate." — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 18:56, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per J04n and Malik Shabazz. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 04:10, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per reasons given above. Afro  ( Not a Talk Page ) - Afkatk 14:51, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete: Per above--&#91;&#91;User: Duffy2032&#124;Duffy2032&#93;&#93; (talk) 07:12, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Talkbottom

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete and add an option to per RL0919

Template is covered by talk header nowadays. There were at about 50 transclusions which I checked that all can be removed since all articles already had talk header. Moreover this template was created long before "new section" appears on the tab bar. Magioladitis (talk) 16:41, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. As unnecessary banner-cruft. -- Quiddity (talk) 21:15, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, superseded. Currently used on a few pages, so subst before deleting.  Nyttend (talk) 23:11, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep seems to emphasize where to place new talk discussions more than talk header does, and that seems to be necessary on some talk pages, perhaps add it as an option on talk header for increased emphasis (a bottom=yes parameter that engages this template perhaps?) 76.66.197.17 (talk) 05:50, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Rather than invoking this separate template, perhaps the better thing would be to incorporate the banner it creates into Talk header, as an option to be activated by a parameter. Then this template could be deleted, but its functionality would just be a setting away. I created an example of what a merged version would probably look like at User:RL0919/MiscTest, with comparisons of the existing and merged versions. It seems like a very easy merge. --RL0919 (talk) 18:00, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * That's also workable. 76.66.197.17 (talk) 07:00, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I like the idea and we can discuss it further in Template talk:Talk header in order to avoid duplications and sometimes stating the obvious. -- Magioladitis (talk) 18:36, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Wikiplayer13

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted under criterion G7 (author requests deletion) by  –B LACK F ALCON  (T ALK ) 00:34, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Test template Taqi Haider (talk) 14:51, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Author blanked.  Ilyushka ☃  Talk!Contribs 17:01, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Fs player nat=Portugal name=Wilson Eduardo pos=FW

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per db-test

Seems like that the creator of this template thought that the template was needed to be created for player to show up in squad list in this edit. List was fixed in next revision, and there is no need for this template to exist.  Ilyushka ☃  Talk!Contribs 13:33, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.