Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 July 5



Template:Finding Nemo

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 14:35, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Small template with 5 links, including the main article. Most of the works are linked through the main article, and the shorts (Exploring the Reef and Knick-Knack) are also linked in the main Pixar template. Not everything needs a navbox LoЯd   ۞pεth  22:49, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Delete As stated above. Jhenderson777 (talk) 20:10, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Queens bus routes

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 07:53, 12 July 2010 (UTC)



All the entries in the infobox are redirects to different locations in the same article. Train2104 (talk) 20:12, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete &mdash; orphaned, useless, and confusing (because of section links) template. PleaseStand (talk) 22:44, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete &mdash; it is completely useless since there is a single article that covers all links. -- LoЯd  ۞pεth  03:08, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox ArthurTVCharacter

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 14:33, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

This template, only used in two articles, is easily replaceable by Infobox character. PleaseStand (talk) 22:06, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Mark Gilmore (UK)/meta/shortname

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 07:53, 12 July 2010 (UTC)



Unused template. There is no article called either Mark Gilmore (UK) or Mark Gilmore, and no links to either title. This template is in Category:United Kingdom political party shortname templates, but I see no evidence that Mark Gilmore is a political party. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:52, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Databasefootball

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 07:52, 12 July 2010 (UTC)



Orphaned EL template, I am not sure if it is being substituted, or simply not in use. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 15:23, 24 June 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:41, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Data/Mud Lake (California)

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 07:52, 12 July 2010 (UTC)



This template, created back in 2007, was only being used on one page, Mud Lake (California), so I orphaned it. It is a somewhat interesting idea to create a template for standardizing lists of places with coordinates, but this solution would have an individual one of these templates for every such place, and hasn't really caught on. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 15:13, 24 June 2010 (UTC) <hr style="width:50%;" /> Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:41, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete No need to dedicate a whole template to just this. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 18:35, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Video game voices
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete and move anime voices to "voiced by" Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 00:56, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Used in only one article and identical to Template:Anime voices. I suggest deleting this and making the other one less specific to anime (maybe a name change?). Axem Titanium (talk) 13:44, 24 June 2010 (UTC) <hr style="width:50%;" /> Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:41, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Torneo Invierno 2010
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 07:51, 12 July 2010 (UTC)



Template not really needed. Additionally, it is redundant as there is essentially does the same thing as this template, which does conform to standard practice and consensus in the applicable project. Digirami (talk) 11:00, 24 June 2010 (UTC) <hr style="width:50%;" /> Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:41, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.