Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 June 23



Template:NCAA Division II Women's Swimming and Diving Championships

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 23:31, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Only contains red links, it's orphanated. A18919 (talk) 07:17, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete—can be recreated when the articles are created.  Imzadi  1979   →   06:15, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NCAA Division III Women's Swimming and Diving Championships

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 23:31, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Only contains red links, it's orphanated. A18919 (talk) 07:18, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete—can be recreated when the articles are created.  Imzadi  1979   →   06:15, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Fredericksburg Gunners

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete per prior consensus concerning navigation boxes with no navigation Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 23:33, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

Unused, only links to 1 page (Fredericksburg Gunners). A18919 (talk) 07:24, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Expand further

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep, though 76.66.195.196 makes some very good points regarding this template's interaction with Template:Expand, and that this template's function could be folded into the other with little issue. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:44, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

This isn't phrased like a cleanup tag, and its meaning rather overlaps with expand. It dates back to when the general banner system wasn't as sophisticated and well-sorted as it is now, and I think it's outlived its usefulness as a separate template. Recommend a merge to expand with a new argument to that template which says "sources are available in the footnotes" or the like. Happy to drum up a sandbox for that myself. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 21:38, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep "Expand" implies that there is nothing there while "Expand further" says that information should be created off of what is already there from what I have noticed. I could be wrong but that is my opinion. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 00:21, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge a new arg can handle adding additional text, and the current template name can function as an intermediate translcusion. 76.66.195.196 (talk) 04:21, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is the only template, that I know of, which can be used by readers (who lack either the time or the expertise to work on an article themselves) to call the attention of other editors to a possibly useful source. Bwrs (talk) 22:30, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep I did not realize we had this--it  could well be used more, and not just by inexperienced editors.  DGG ( talk ) 00:49, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2000/01 Zurich Premiership Table

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 23:32, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

recently created template that was just used in one article. It has since been subst into that article. It is unlikely that any other article will use it. noq (talk) 18:19, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete redundant. CSD T3 eligible?  Imzadi  1979   →   06:15, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2001/02 Zurich Premiership Table

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 23:32, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

recently created template that was just used in one article. It has since been subst into that article. It is unlikely that any other article will use it. noq (talk) 18:19, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete redundant. CSD T3 eligible?  Imzadi  1979   →   06:15, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.