Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 March 25



Template:Donation

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 02:38, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Template offers a bizarre combination of religious/biological/automotive donations that are all listed as "non-financial," even though a car, in effect, is tangible property. The main issue is the fact that Judaism's views on organ donation are for some reason the focus of a template on bodily fluid, etc. donation.  DRosenbach  ( Talk 04:47, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree. I created the template "long" ago, and now I don't see the clear relationship between the contents. Mikael Häggström (talk) 04:54, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, an unuseful hodge-podge. --CliffC (talk) 15:46, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:The Penguins of Madagascar

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Unused and redundant to the franchise template. RL0919 (talk) 19:28, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

This template has no transclusions. Most of its information is redundant content found on or linking from the article “The Penguins of Madagascar.” There are few articles that this template could ever possibly be included on. Also, there already exists a template for the “Madagascar” movie franchise in general (Template:Madagascar}, which is used on many articles related to the movie and its associated spin-offs. Overall, one for the TV show itself seems redundant and unnecessary, at least at present. Additionally, although the template probably isn’t warranted anyway, I feel it is also notable to point out that the template contains incorrect information. Some of the voice actors listed on it voiced characters in the “Madagascar” films, but not on the show itself. Sgt. R.K. Blue (talk) 04:01, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Redundant to the franchise's template, which can sufficiently corral the very few articles tied to the TV spinoff (which, I must say, is the best thing on Nickelodeon in nearly a decade). Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:40, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Universalism

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Underpopulated navbox with a weak relationship among the links. RL0919 (talk) 19:26, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Only a handful of articles and barely related to the topic of Universalism —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:13, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. The connections between the articles are not apparent. How is Judaism related to an early Christin scholar?
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.