Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 March 27



Template:CB-support2

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete all per WP:CSD as re-creation of deleted material. As the nominator notes, similar templates have deleted many times in the past, always with a strong consenus for their removal, and those deletions have been upheld so many times that they are now listed at Deletion review/Perennial requests. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:10, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

All of these templates are substantially similar to templates that were deleted previously, such as Template:Keep and Template:Oppose. I informed the Method for consensus building participants of the previous discussions, but they have decided to ignore the previous consensus and have refused my request to get consensus before using them outside of the project (see discussion), so I'm starting the discussion for them. For reference, the previous related discussions (that I can find) are: -- Mr.Z-man 17:14, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) 2005 TFD
 * 2) 2006 TFD
 * 3) 2007 TFD
 * 4) July 2008 DRV
 * 5) September 2008 DRV
 * 6) December 2008 TFD
 * 7) January 2009 DRV


 * Comment - Can you please state what is the reason for this nomination as per Templates_for_deletion? If there is no actual reason, this Tfd is not justified. (Nothing personal) --JokerXtreme (talk) 17:36, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Sullivan University Global e-Learning

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Navbox with no wikilinks (now no links at all, formerly only external links). RL0919 (talk) 17:57, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Used almost exclusively for promoting this business on unrelated articles. Template consists only of external links. Haakon (talk) 09:02, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unambiguous promotional material. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 09:59, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Navboxes are for internal navigation. All links are external to the same domain. ---— Gadget850 (Ed)  talk 11:07, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Edited. This Navbox was completely redone and no longer includes any external links. While there might now be an argument that its content is redundant, due to a table in the article, hopefully it will be recognized that this table is a much condensed version of the very larger one in the article content, and therefore is a more focused table for the reader. AnonymousNKY (talk) 11:11, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Navboxes are intended to logically connect articles. There are no links at all in the new version, so I don't understand the use. ---— Gadget850 (Ed)  talk 19:15, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.