Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 May 18



Template:Daisy Dares You

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 02:36, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Music artist with one single and no album release. Template simply not needed for navigation. Author of template also has a long history of introducing templates and articles that are similar in nature and end up deleted/redirected. - eo (talk) 18:16, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete no reason whatsoever for this template to exist. as eric said, 1 single and no album. Mister sparky (talk) 19:35, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NewdelrevUCFD

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 02:46, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

UCFD doesn't exist anymore since some time, and Drv2, the commonly used template for the deletion review has a xfd_page parameter where the UCFD discussion can easily be added. The Evil IP address (talk) 15:56, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Since I was notified (thanks!), I have no objection to this deletion, seems routine, if UCFD no longer exists we certainly don't need a specialised template as we did back in December 2007. ++Lar: t/c 16:06, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

2009–10 Persian Gulf Cup templates

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete as they have been merged with 2009–10 Persian Gulf Cup Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 02:52, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

The templates were only transcluded by a single article, therefore no reason to wrap the content into a template. Soccer-holicI hear voices in my head... 15:03, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Soccer-holicI hear voices in my head... 15:18, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2009–10 English football level 8 relegation pool

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 02:48, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

As per condition three for deleting templates; this template is not used and unlikely to be used again. It is a redundant football league table, superseded by decisions made by the FA. Pretty Green (talk) 13:36, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Soccer-holicI hear voices in my head... 15:20, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. --Soccer-holicI hear voices in my head... 15:25, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Jameboy (talk) 11:26, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Bretonbanquet (talk) 12:25, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NYSR-SA

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 02:49, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Deprecated; functionality incorporated into U.S. Roads WikiProject. –  T M F 04:12, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per nom.  Dough 48  72  01:35, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. &mdash;Fredddie™ 01:35, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Featuredpash
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 02:49, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Deprecated; functionality incorporated into U.S. Roads WikiProject. –  T M F 04:12, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Per nom.  Dough 48  72  01:35, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. &mdash;Fredddie™ 01:35, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cite site
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy Delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 07:43, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Hardcoded instance of a single citation. This "template" is completely redundant to Cite web, and the only useful use in an article can easily be converted. The source itself may or may not be reliable, but that is neither here nor there. Intelligent  sium  01:45, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete useless ref that is not a "site", it is a particular site, that is NOT informatively named. 70.29.210.155 (talk) 04:37, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.