Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 November 3



Template:Judoka

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — ξ xplicit  01:13, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Only used on one article. Other Judoka articles are using Infobox martial artist WOSlinker (talk) 23:36, 3 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom -- Extra   999  (Contact me  +  contribs) 01:45, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. It seems to exist only for one article, so no need. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 11:01, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete and replace per nom. Redundant. PC78 (talk) 15:33, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

NBA Conference Final broadcasters

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete both. — ξ xplicit  01:13, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Unused templates in article mainspaces, only in talk pages. Also, not beneficial templates as they don't elucidate anything. Jrcla2 (talk) 21:59, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. These unused templates are pretty useless.— Chris! c / t 01:05, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Graphic Smash

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — ξ xplicit  01:13, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

No parent article for Graphic Smash. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 19:57, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant to other navigation. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 05:54, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Wonderland (band)

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. — ξ xplicit  01:13, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Not many links, only used in two articles, hence it has limited usefulness. Seems rather premature for a band that has yet to release anything. PC78 (talk) 19:21, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - I just nominated it for the same reason not realising it had been nominated already because the creator removed the TFD notice from the template. This navigation template is not useful, all links are easily accessed from the main article. Anemone  Projectors
 * Delete per nom and AnemoneProjectors. It's too premature. When the band have released something, maybe then it can be recreated. - JuneGloom    Schmooze  15:07, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Tao Lin

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 05:52, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

redundant: only red links Artiquities (talk) 04:47, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Delete per nom -- Extra   999  (Contact me  +  contribs) 01:41, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Per above. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 11:01, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Starrquacks

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deleted under G7 speedy deletion criterion by. Non-admin closure. ~Super</i> Hamster  Talk Contribs 00:58, 4 November 2010 (UTC)

The purpose of this template seems to be to provide a quotation that can be transcluded into multiple articles at the same time; alas, this is rather useless and unnecessary, and serves as more of a hindrance than a helpful tool. Template namespace states that "Templates should not masquerade as article content in the main article namespace; instead, place the text directly into the article", and this should not be an exception. The template is used in only one article, and it is unlikely to be used again, rendering it as useless and less efficient than simply using straight text. In addition, not only is it an irregularity, but in the event that it would have to be changed for whatever reason, the actual template would have to be edited, or replaced by the actual text - once again, that renders the template as useless. ~<i style="color:#07517C;">Super</i> Hamster  Talk Contribs 01:56, 3 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete I placed the transcluded text directly into The Social Transformation of American Medicine. "Fire when ready, Gridley!" --Uncle Ed (talk) 22:08, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * All right, I've tagged the template for speedy deletion under G7 criterion. Thanks, ~<i style="color:#07517C;">Super</i> Hamster  Talk Contribs 00:30, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.