Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 September 30



Template:Infobox television personality

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 03:17, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Only 133 uses, and all of the main biographical fields are present in Infobox person. The only unique fields here are for a number of specific awards, but I suggest deprecating these and using the singular awards field instead. A similar setup was heavily debated and ultimately rejected for Infobox actor a few years ago; to summarise the main points of that debate, it was felt that an infobox was not the place for such lengthy, structured lists, and that an arbitrary selection of specific awards was inherantly POV with a strong Western bias. I think these same arguments apply here. PC78 (talk) 17:36, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Infobox person will do. -- WOSlinker (talk) 13:51, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete – Seems to be redundant to Template:Infobox person. Also, would a redirect to that template work (especially given the parameters)? Hey  Mid  (contributions) 15:29, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:FC Twente top scorers

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 04:52, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

As far as category "Association football top scorer awards templates", there is no individual template for the top scorers of each club season. I find this template redundant. —Chrisportelli (talk) 09:05, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 20:11, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - just because other club top scorer templates don't yet exist, doesn't mean that they shouldn't. GiantSnowman 20:16, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. I think this is not an appropriate topic for a navbox. Information is already listed (in more detail) on the FC Twente page. Otherwise where does this stop? FC Twente captains, FC Twente Players of the Year, ...? As an example, J V of Hesselink article doesn't even mention he was top scorer for Twente and yet we need a navbox for it! Rambo's Revenge (talk)  20:31, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. I think it should mention he was the top goalscorer of the team, but only in his honours' section labeled as Individual Achievements or something like that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.225.158.227 (talk) 01:29, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Football (soccer) NT squad templates

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 03:17, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Roster templates are only needed for FIFA and Confederation competitions. -— Lomocompact talk 02:13, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Lomocompact (talk) 02:13, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete all - Consensus has been established at WP:FOOTY that these navigation boxes are unnecessary for local tournaments like these which are not Confederation championships. They encourage creation of non-notable football biographies (through the many redlinks) and it would be impossible to maintain navboxes for all of these minor tournaments. Jogurney (talk) 02:50, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and Jogurney. GiantSnowman 20:11, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:OTA

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 03:17, 8 October 2010 (UTC)

Template for a small UK association (240 members). Almost none of the links given in the template are notable: all council members are redirects to the association. None of the awards seem to be very significant either and I have redirected them to the same article, the same goes for the single publication listed. Not even the president has his own article... The template has been deleted after TfD several times before, but that referred to a different organisation. As it stands, this template is not used in any article at all. Crusio (talk) 09:15, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Most of the links that do not relink to the main article, are for the British Orthodontic Association, a different organization. 76.66.200.95 (talk) 05:09, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.