Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 April 1



Template:Roman name

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Magioladitis (talk) 20:35, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Unuseful template, explaining what should be explained in text, if at all. To add to its problems, it is used at Vespasian, prodcing, "Vespasian is a Roman name"; it isn't. Vespasian is the English name of a Roman Emperor. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 18:28, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as nom; the joke deletion request is below. Despite the date, this is serious. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 18:30, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. If the nomenclature needs to be explained, the template is inadequate. If the name requires no explanation, the template is redundant. Since many Roman biographies need disambiguating or other top notes, the template adds distracting clutter at the beginning of the article. I inquired at the Classical Greece & Rome project, and no one seemed to know its origin or purpose. Cynwolfe (talk) 21:18, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Nom and Cynwolfe seem to have covered it, particularly if the project doesn't know about it. Dougweller (talk) 08:19, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, per above. Paul August &#9742; 16:41, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Citation needed

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was . Armbrust WrestleMania XXVII  Undertaker 19–0  01:27, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Because nothing is ever wrong on Wikipedia.[citation needed] Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 11:27, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete we don't need no stinking cites 65.93.12.101 (talk) 14:17, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as overused. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 18:31, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Template:Insane. Frietjes (talk) 19:56, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - All sources are reliable. CycloneGU (talk) 20:21, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Change text to rainbow colors, otherwise, delete.  Swarm   X 21:27, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Modern pentathlete

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 02:22, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Unused. It's just a copy of Infobox sportsperson. I could send it for T3 too. Magioladitis (talk) 01:37, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (User: Pigsonthewing ); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 10:17, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NFLContract

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 02:21, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

I think Template:Infobox NFL player doesn't use contract anymore making this template useless. Magioladitis (talk) 01:30, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as useless. Frietjes (talk) 19:16, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.