Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 April 4



Template:2010–11 La Liga Infobox

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 00:09, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Single-use completed version of Infobox Football league season "". We don't use templates that way. Andy Mabbett (User: Pigsonthewing ); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 21:06, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Comment: I didn't create the infobox in the first place, so I wouldn't mind the infobox template being removed. However, I know that the reason they created a template was because there was controversy between the number of goals scored by Cristiano Ronaldo. This also happened with the goalscorers list, so we created two lists. One according to normal FIFA rules, and the other one according to newspaper Marca's rules who award the Pichichi Trophy at the end of the season. Qampunen; 21:13, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete after replacement in article. Frietjes (talk) 19:24, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:O Rly?

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete as test page, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 20:39, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

This template seems unused and I can not think of a use for it Guerillero &#124; My Talk  &#124;  Review Me  18:28, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Clear View Education Center

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 00:08, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Navigational template which doesn't navigate anyweher useful. This template, used on one article, just duplicates the info which is in the infobox, where it should be. All it does is create double maintenance effort for zero benefit. Fram (talk) 08:19, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, not a navigation box. Frietjes (talk) 19:23, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Clear Lake High School

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 00:08, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

This looks like a navigational template, but it doesn't navigate anywhere. It is only used in one article, where the info in this template is already included in the infobox, where it should be. To duplicate the same info hidden at the bottom of the article serves no purpose, and only makes maintenance harder (if e.g. the assistant principal changes, you not only need to change the infbox, but also this template, without any actual benefits). Fram (talk) 08:07, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, not a navigation box. Frietjes (talk) 19:22, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.