Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 August 20



Template:Garden State Bowl

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_ Zero 16:56, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Garden State Bowl

all year links are redirects to Garden State Bowl and Garden State Bowl is the only non-redirect link in the template nymets2000  ( t / c / l ) 21:55, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. This navbox doesn't actually navigate anything. Jrcla2 (talk) 20:20, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

College football roster templates

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 18:29, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
 * CFB roster/Header
 * CFB roster/Player
 * CFB roster/Footer

These templates are unused and they are effectively duplicates of Template:American football roster/Header, Template:American football roster/Player, Template:American football roster/Footer. Jweiss11 (talk) 21:14, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Doesn't navigate anything. Jrcla2 (talk) 20:54, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Seal rationale

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Redirect to Symbol rationale. Ruslik_ Zero 17:03, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Seal rationale

Completely redundant to the more generalised Symbol rationale. Sir Armbrust Talk to me  Contribs  08:51, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Symbol rationale per nom. PhilKnight (talk) 14:33, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Non-free use rationale film poster

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete after replacement per Sfan00 IMG. Plastikspork (talk) 01:46, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Non-free use rationale film poster

Superseeded by and completely redundant to Non-free use rationale poster. Sir Armbrust Talk to me  Contribs  08:49, 20 August 2011 (UTC)


 * No objections if the existing uses are migrated first, I will also note that the wording of film poster vs poster is slightly different. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:11, 20 August 2011 (UTC)


 * You need to replace {{Non-free use rationale film poster with {{Non-free use rationale poster|Media=film if there isn't already a Media field present. Given the number of rationales, I suggest AWB

or a bot be used for this migration. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:35, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Coat of arms rationale

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 18:05, 2 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Coat of arms rationale

Completely redundant to the more generalised Symbol rationale. Sir Armbrust Talk to me  Contribs  08:45, 20 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.