Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 December 20



Template:I Am... Sasha Fierce

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 00:17, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I Am... Sasha Fierce

Portions of template are redundant of Template:Beyoncé_Knowles_singles. In addition, the portions that aren't could easily fit into the template. | help dןǝɥ  | 23:10, 20 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Same information that can be written in Template:Beyoncé Knowles singles and Template:Beyoncé Knowles. No need to share the information, two templates is sufficient. This version does not add any information for articles. Lucas Brígido  msg 00:44, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - per Lucas Brígido. Template:Beyoncé Knowles singles and Template:Beyoncé Knowles do the same job. Calvin  • Watch  n'  Learn 15:54, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - Relevant. Great job by the articles of the album. Silencio faz bem (talk) 21:54, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This seems like a case of WP:ILIKEIT... | help dןǝɥ  | 23:20, 21 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete: A template for an individual album? is not necessary, repeated information. BibiLoves (talk) 20:55, 22 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete I agree with other users, this Template is not necessary. JBoy02 (talk) 17:07, 23 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Agreed that the templates are not needed. Ratizi  Angelou  contribs 01:25, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:4 (Beyoncé Knowles album)
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 00:20, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * 4 (Beyoncé Knowles album)

Portions of template are redundant of Template:Beyoncé_Knowles_singles. In addition, the portions that aren't could easily fit into the template. <b style="color:blue;">|</b> <sup style="color:black;">help <sub style="margin-left:-3.8ex; color:black;">dןǝɥ  <b style="color:blue;">|</b> 23:10, 20 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Same information that can be written in Template:Beyoncé Knowles singles and Template:Beyoncé Knowles. No need to share the information, two templates is sufficient. This version does not add any information for articles. Lucas Brígido  msg 00:41, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - Out of the 15 songs found on 4, only four are singles. Nine other songs have their own articles. Jivesh 1205 (Talk) 05:22, 21 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Note: Most of the time (with the exception of the The Beatles and other artists with 7 or more studio albums and articles for most/all tracks) the songs can fit in the singles template in the "Other songs" group. What about this case? <b style="color:blue;">|</b> <sup style="color:black;">help <sub style="margin-left:-3.8ex; color:black;">dןǝɥ  <b style="color:blue;">|</b> 05:54, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - per Lucas Brígido. Template:Beyoncé Knowles singles and Template:Beyoncé Knowles do the same job. Calvin  • Watch  n'  Learn 15:54, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - Content enough to have a template. This would contemplate a wonderful work of the ERA 4 made ​​by our friends. Silencio faz bem (talk) 21:49, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: That seems like a case of WP:ILIKEIT... <b style="color:blue;">|</b> <sup style="color:black;">help <sub style="margin-left:-3.8ex; color:black;">dןǝɥ  <b style="color:blue;">|</b> 23:19, 21 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep It has enough information to have a seperate template Elektrik  Band  04:02, 22 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete: A template for an individual album? is not necessary, repeated information. BibiLoves (talk) 20:54, 22 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete I agree with other users, this Template is not necessary. JBoy02 (talk) 17:07, 23 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Agreed that the templates are not needed. Ratizi  Angelou  contribs 01:25, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete All the articles are in other navboxes. Remember that navboxes exist to aid navigation, not to outline a topic. —  Andrew s talk  04:14, 26 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Redundant navigation template when the Beyoncé and Beyoncé singles templates do the job. — WP: PENGUIN  · [ TALK ]  12:29, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:B'Day
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 00:23, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * B'Day

Portions of template are redundant of Template:Beyoncé_Knowles_singles. In addition, the portions that aren't could easily fit into the template. <b style="color:blue;">|</b> <sup style="color:black;">help <sub style="margin-left:-3.8ex; color:black;">dןǝɥ  <b style="color:blue;">|</b> 23:10, 20 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Same information that can be written in Template:Beyoncé Knowles singles and Template:Beyoncé Knowles. No need to share the information, two templates is sufficient. This version does not add any information for articles. Lucas Brígido  msg 00:44, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - per Lucas Brígido. Template:Beyoncé Knowles singles and Template:Beyoncé Knowles do the same job. Calvin  • Watch  n'  Learn 15:54, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - Relevant. Great job by the articles of the album. Silencio faz bem (talk) 21:51, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note:This seems like a case of WP:ILIKEIT... <b style="color:blue;">|</b> <sup style="color:black;">help <sub style="margin-left:-3.8ex; color:black;">dןǝɥ  <b style="color:blue;">|</b> 23:19, 21 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete: A template for an individual album? is not necessary, repeated information. BibiLoves (talk) 20:55, 22 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete I agree with other users, this Template is not necessary. JBoy02 (talk) 17:07, 23 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Agreed that the templates are not needed. Ratizi  Angelou  contribs 01:25, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Surprised to have seen this. Seems organized. However, Lucas is correct. It only repeats those in the main templates. Implementation of such category of template is very daunting, and purpose is superfluous. --Efe (talk) 14:05, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox North-East India
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 00:38, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Infobox North-East India

Unused hardcoded geography infobox. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 11:40, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:38, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox South India
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 01:49, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Infobox South India

Hardcoded template used only at South India. Should be replaced with a standard inline geography infobox. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 11:39, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete and use a standard infobox, per nom. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:36, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Joshua Issac (talk) 22:25, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Topics related to Technopark
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 00:39, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Topics related to Technopark

Unused, even at the parent article. A bit of a grab-bag of semirelated topics in a format predating navbox standardisation. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 11:38, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:South Asian television channels
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 00:39, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * South Asian television channels

Unused. Appears to have been superseded by more specific templates, as listing every TV channel in South Asia is probably rather excessive for one navbox. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 11:36, 20 December 2011 (UTC) Channels in undefined need to be split up per language into multiple templates. This template should not be transcluded directly
 * Comment this is not a navbox the entire navbox is in a "noinclude" section. The only thing this does is:
 * 76.65.128.198 (talk) 06:08, 21 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete this template makes no sense the way it is currently written. It's been written this way since 2007! 76.65.128.198 (talk) 06:08, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as deprecated Bulwersator (talk) 16:03, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Split and Delete - split by language or country, then delete. --Joshua Issac (talk) 22:36, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Openness
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was on Templates for_discussion/Log/2012_January_6. Ruslik_ Zero 15:57, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Openness

Unused navbox Bulwersator (talk) 07:30, 20 December 2011 (UTC)


 * See last month's TfD. It appears that though said TfD didn't come to a consensus, work has been done to orphan this in favour of intellectual property activism, which seems to have been the right choice. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 11:24, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Could you point out what work you're referring to? --Waldir talk 16:44, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Last month this template had lots of transclusions. Now it doesn't. One assumes this means someone has orphaned it. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 10:27, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:40, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Partial merge -- maybe not all entries belong in the intellectual property activism template, but many of them do (e.g. Open access) and they should definitely be in a nav template. I oppose deletion if the relevant entries aren't transferred, because the concepts listed at Openness are clearly related to each other and ought to be grouped together to ease findability and navigation. Waldir talk 16:12, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Oran Province Labelled Map
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 02:20, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Oran Province Labelled Map

Unused, purpose unclear Bulwersator (talk) 07:30, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Oranget
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge with "orange (color)" Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 02:25, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Oranget

Unused, purpose unclear Bulwersator (talk) 07:29, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, why do we have an orange text template? 76.65.128.198 (talk) 06:11, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete in favor of orange (color) (a redirect would be, IMO, implausible in this case). — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:51, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep wait what? Why would we delete the simple one and keep the longer version?  S ven M anguard   Wha?  15:48, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment both are cryptically named, this one more so. (the other one doesn't indicate it is text color that is changed, instead of say, background) 76.65.128.132 (talk) 04:35, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - per Sven Manguard. This is the simpler version. Delete/redirect orange (color) instead. --Joshua Issac (talk) 22:39, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:OrderOfMagnitudeTOC
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 00:41, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * OrderOfMagnitudeTOC

Unused, purpose unclear Bulwersator (talk) 07:29, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Agree. I made it in 2009 and clearly didn't finish it. (My plan was to tidy up the Orders of magnitude (numbers) article.) Sorry about that. RupertMillard (Talk) 10:46, 24 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Homeworld
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_ Zero 14:40, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Homeworld

Superseded by Template:Relic Entertainment. Fleet Command (talk) 07:29, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Orders of magnitude (length)
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 00:41, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Orders of magnitude (length)

Unused, purpose unclear Bulwersator (talk) 07:28, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge with Template:Orders of magnitude (length) wide, and let editors select which one to use based on a switch. It serves the same purpose. 76.65.128.198 (talk) 06:15, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Orfu
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 00:44, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Orfu

Unused, purpose unclear Bulwersator (talk) 07:28, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Presumably meant to be substituted, but the #time parserfunction hasn't been made subst-friendly, so it is broken. This leads me to believe no-one is using it, so it can safely be deleted. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:22, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:OrganicBox abbreviations
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_ Zero 13:27, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * OrganicBox abbreviations

Unused, purpose unclear Bulwersator (talk) 07:28, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment IIRC, this is part of a complex set of templates used by organic chemistry boxes. I've informed WPChemistry. 76.65.128.198 (talk) 06:21, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Is it a daughter template of the widely-used Template:OrganicBox? -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:39, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * delete, it is very old and no longer used by Template:OrganicBox. Frietjes (talk) 17:24, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:OrganicBox synonyms
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_ Zero 13:28, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
 * OrganicBox synonyms

Unused, purpose unclear Bulwersator (talk) 07:28, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment IIRC, this is part of a complex set of templates used by organic chemistry boxes. I've informed WPChemistry. 76.65.128.198 (talk) 06:21, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Is it a daughter template of the widely-used Template:OrganicBox? -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:39, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * delete, it is very old and no longer used by Template:OrganicBox. Frietjes (talk) 17:24, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Organization of American States Leaders
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 20:22, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Organization of American States Leaders

Unused navbox Bulwersator (talk) 07:26, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Oriental Orthodoxy2
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 20:22, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Oriental Orthodoxy2

Unused navbox Bulwersator (talk) 07:26, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Oriente Petrolero Players
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 20:24, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Oriente Petrolero Players

Unused duplicate of Oriente_Petrolero Bulwersator (talk) 07:25, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:OrigLayout
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 20:24, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
 * OrigLayout

Unused, purpose unclear Bulwersator (talk) 07:24, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Orissa symbols
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete after replacement with Infobox state symbols. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 20:31, 1 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Orissa symbols

Unused, purpose unclear Bulwersator (talk) 07:24, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The template is used in the article Orissa. It is in similar lines with Template:Kerala symbols. Hence, I have removed the Tfd tag from the template. -- Aarem (Talk) 08:17, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Strange Bulwersator (talk) 10:59, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

I'm taking the unusual step of reopening this as it's still only used on a single article. We do not habitually move all table content to templatespace. Kerala symbols should be a co-nom. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 11:33, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Subst and delete both templates. 76.65.128.198 (talk) 06:27, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge into Template:Infobox state symbols. --Joshua Issac (talk) 22:45, 27 December 2011 (UTC)


 * I am co-nominating Bihar State Symbols and Tamil Nadu symbols. --Joshua Issac (talk) 21:25, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Orr
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete, NAC
 * Orr

Unused, purpose unclear Bulwersator (talk) 07:23, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment this is always unused, it is a substitution template, says so right in the coding that does a subst check at the top. 76.65.128.198 (talk) 06:30, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment I think it is broken, the template it depends, Orphaned replaced, was deleted. 76.65.128.198 (talk) 06:34, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Tagged as speedy (dependent page of a page which does not exist) Bulwersator (talk) 08:16, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Other BC routes
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 20:46, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Other BC routes

Unused navbox Bulwersator (talk) 07:23, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Otariidae nav
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 20:46, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Otariidae nav

Unused navbox Bulwersator (talk) 07:23, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Software screenshot rationale
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete per Alpha_Quadrant. Ruslik_ Zero 14:50, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Software screenshot rationale
 * Screenshot rationale

This is an excessively complicated FUR which has very low use because most software screenshots use either the general Non-free use rationale or in some rare cases Non-free image data. While one option would be to move software screenshots over, that would be time consuming, and there is nothing that this template would convey but a well filled out general Non-free use rationale would not convey.

In short this is a confusing and entirely redundant template.

If the consensus is for delete, I will personally ensure that the seven files currently using this (soon to be four) are converted properly.  S ven M anguard  Wha?  07:09, 20 December 2011 (UTC)


 * I can't see any compelling argument not to just use the standard FUR template here. The additional boilerplate about "not enabling users to create infringing copies of the software" is a little bizarre; it's difficult to come up with a situation where that would ever be possible from a screenshot. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 11:42, 20 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Just added Screenshot rationale, which redirects to Software screenshot rationale, to this TfD.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  08:12, 23 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep First I would like to address the perceived low usage. There was another template (I cannot remember the name, sorry) that insisted on users substituting it into a page instead of transcluding it. I created this one so that it does not require substitution and put in parameters to allow it to cover a variety of screenshots with tailored messages. Additionally, I would like to point out that Non-free use rationale is made to facilitate the creation of domain specific templates. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 18:14, 24 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Useless.  No reason not to use . - F ASTILY  (TALK) 02:25, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I'd rather not go and fill out Non-free use rationale every time I put up a screenshot. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 17:44, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Per the non-free use criteria, pages need specific fair use rationale for each use. The non-free use rationale needs to demonstrate the contextual significance (NFCC #8) of the non-free file. While a template may work to a degree for logos and album covers, it does not for software screenshots. Logos and album covers are used to assist the reader in identifying the subject. The generic Template:Non-free use rationale logo usually suffices in establishing contextual significance for logo usage. Software screenshot non-free use rationale need to be more elaborate, as the circumstances for each usage are different. Non-free use images should only be used in limited circumstances. There needs to be a strong and convincing non-free use rationale for each image use because the images are not free. This template's non-free use rationale is pitiful. No matter how this template is revised, it will be unable to create a generic rationale that could convincingly apply to a significant number of files. Alpha_Quadrant    (talk)  21:26, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:PD-MD-exempt
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Magioladitis (talk) 20:06, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * PD-MD-exempt

Orphaned, no transclusions, not a standard license template, unlikely to be used, no foreseeable use.  F ASTILY s  (TALK) 03:53, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:PD-KZ-exempt
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Magioladitis (talk) 20:07, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * PD-KZ-exempt

Orphaned, no transclusions, not a standard license template, unlikely to be used, no foreseeable use.  F ASTILY s  (TALK) 03:53, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:PD-GE-exempt
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Magioladitis (talk) 20:14, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * PD-GE-exempt

Orphaned, no transclusions, not a standard license template, unlikely to be used, no foreseeable use.  F ASTILY s  (TALK) 03:53, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:PD-BiH-exempt
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Magioladitis (talk) 20:15, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * PD-BiH-exempt

Orphaned, no transclusions, not a standard license template, unlikely to be used, no foreseeable use.  F ASTILY s  (TALK) 03:53, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:PD-AZ-exempt
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Magioladitis (talk) 20:13, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * PD-AZ-exempt

Orphaned, no transclusions, not a standard license template, unlikely to be used, no foreseeable use.  F ASTILY s  (TALK) 03:53, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Non-free currency-DZ
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Magioladitis (talk) 20:13, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Non-free currency-DZ

Orphaned, no transclusions, not a standard license template, unlikely to be used, no foreseeable use.  F ASTILY s  (TALK) 03:53, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:PD-AM-exempt
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Magioladitis (talk) 20:13, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * PD-AM-exempt

Orphaned, no transclusions, not a standard license template, unlikely to be used, no foreseeable use.  F ASTILY s  (TALK) 03:53, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:UN map
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_ Zero 15:53, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * UN map

Orphaned, no transclusions, not a standard license template, unlikely to be used, no foreseeable use.  F ASTILY s  (TALK) 03:52, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * "unlikely to be used, no foreseeable use"? commons:Template:UN map/en has almost 400 transclusions, and there are also files tagged with commons:Template:PD-UN that should really use it. I have no opinion on whether there should be local copies for these licenses, though. 88.148.249.186 (talk) 14:22, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * AFAIK free files are supposed to be uploaded to commons Bulwersator (talk) 14:24, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. It is no longer necessary to have local copies of Commons license templates, due to the end of the practice of locally uploading Main Page images. — This, that, and the other (talk) 02:20, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Right license
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Magioladitis (talk) 20:14, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Right license

Orphaned, no transclusions, not a standard file template, unlikely to be used, no foreseeable use.  F ASTILY s  (TALK) 03:52, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Open Font
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Magioladitis (talk) 20:13, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Open Font

Orphaned, no transclusions, not a standard license template, unlikely to be used, no foreseeable use.  F ASTILY s  (TALK) 03:52, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:MTL
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_ Zero 14:10, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * MTL

Orphaned, no transclusions, not a standard license template, unlikely to be used, no foreseeable use.  F ASTILY s  (TALK) 03:52, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Question Why was not the author notified? Ruslik_ Zero 14:31, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * the author has been inactive for about a year and a half, so it probably doesn't matter. Frietjes (talk) 17:22, 4 January 2012 (UTC)


 * delete as unused and unlikely to be used. Frietjes (talk) 17:22, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:ISC
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Magioladitis (talk) 20:13, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * ISC

Orphaned, no transclusions, not a standard license template, unlikely to be used, no foreseeable use.  F ASTILY s  (TALK) 03:51, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Iran copyright
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep. Ruslik_ Zero 14:26, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Iran copyright

Orphaned, no transclusions, not a standard license template, unlikely to be used, no foreseeable use.  F ASTILY s  (TALK) 03:51, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment: Is that true? Iranian contents are treated as copyright-protected in Wikipedia? Well, at least that prove informative! But is it not better to use it instead of deleting it? I did run into Iranian contents while attending to backlogs. Fleet Command (talk) 15:30, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Gray's Anatomy plate
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 20:18, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Gray's Anatomy plate

Orphaned, no transclusions, not a standard license template, unlikely to be used, no foreseeable use.  F ASTILY s  (TALK) 03:51, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:GPL-3
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 20:15, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
 * GPL-3

Orphaned, no transclusions, not a standard license template, unlikely to be used, no foreseeable use.  F ASTILY s  (TALK) 03:51, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:GFDL-GMT
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 20:15, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
 * GFDL-GMT

Orphaned, no transclusions, not a standard license template, unlikely to be used, no foreseeable use.  F ASTILY s  (TALK) 03:51, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete No reason that the non map specific GFDL couldn't be used.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  08:15, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:GFDL-author
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep. Ruslik_ Zero 14:23, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
 * GFDL-author

Orphaned, no transclusions, not a standard license template, unlikely to be used, no foreseeable use.  F ASTILY s  (TALK) 03:51, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep: as a parallel to PD-author, there's a decent chance it'll be used in the future. --Carnildo (talk) 00:12, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Considering the fact that we are moving all eligible free files to commons and deferring all new free uploads there, it is highly unlikely we will ever have a tranclusion. Alpha_Quadrant    (talk)  21:07, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Unless we're planning on disabling local uploads entirely, free files will continue to be uploaded to the English Wikipedia. That being the case, we really should have the necessary templates to ensure they're tagged properly before being moved to Commons. --Carnildo (talk) 09:17, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Apache-2.0
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 20:13, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Apache-2.0

Orphaned, no transclusions, not a standard license template, unlikely to be used, no foreseeable use.  F ASTILY s  (TALK) 03:50, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete There is no reason that this specific project would ever have need for a software code specific license. We're not going to screenshot the code, and if someone was storing the code in full, they'd be doing it at WikiSource.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  08:16, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with the user Sven Manguard. JBoy02 (talk) 17:10, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:AMI
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 20:12, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
 * AMI

Orphaned, no transclusions, not a standard license template, unlikely to be used, no foreseeable use.  F ASTILY s  (TALK) 03:50, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per the deletion rationale at Commons.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  08:17, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with the user Sven Manguard. JBoy02 (talk) 17:09, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:PD-Hola Vecino
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Deleted by. Alpha_Quadrant   (talk)  17:23, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
 * PD-Hola Vecino

Orphaned, no transclusions, not a standard license template, unlikely to be used, no foreseeable use.  F ASTILY s  (TALK) 03:44, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Two images, File:Holavecino.jpg and File:Sevende hv.jpg, use it. That being said, this is a rather poor solution for two images. Use the proper OTRS template and a PD-author release instead. Life is simpler when we're not dealing with unnecessary templates used only for a small number of files.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  08:20, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with the user Sven Manguard. JBoy02 (talk) 17:09, 23 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.