Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 February 15



Template:Jerusalem

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 04:03, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Jerusalem
 * Jerusalem large

Propose merging Template:Jerusalem with Template:Jerusalem large.

Template:Jerusalem is old, unused and (sorry) pretty ugly. Template:Jerusalemlarge is much better and used very widely. No need for two. Oncenawhile (talk) 18:23, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Suggest: then keep the name 'Jerusalem', no need for the '... large'. -DePiep (talk) 00:05, 17 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment: I would also agree with keeping the name "Jerusalem." Adding "large" to it would be peculiar. --Sgt. R.K. Blue (talk) 07:49, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Otheruses-word

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirect, after suitable replacement if necessary. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 04:20, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Hatnote. Replacable with other uses of. Reducing number of near-similar variants for the same situation. DePiep (talk) 16:06, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Template:Other uses. These are essentially the same template. Template:Otheruses-word is not the same as Template:Other uses of as the latter allows for replacing the default text, whereas the former does not.  McLerristarr &#124;  Mclay1  05:47, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * re: Is why I proposed replacing, not redirect. Leading argument is the resulting text, not the technicality. Maintaining "the word" (as Redirect would do) keeps a weasel-word, i.e. a more-text-adding-nothing sentence. In general, there is no reason to keep a different phrasing for the same situation. -DePiep (talk) 11:06, 22 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I'm not proposing we keep the template, just redirecting it rather than deleting it. Redirecting the template to Other uses would simply remove "of the word" in the hatnote.  McLerristarr &#124;  Mclay1  04:48, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * re We agree, I think my wording was too tough instead of common ground. -DePiep (talk) 12:28, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Richard E. Bellman Control Heritage Award

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge, no objections. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 04:09, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

Unused. But, I want to establish consensus: the templates Richard E. Bellman Control Heritage Award 1979–2000 Laureates and Richard E. Bellman Control Heritage Award Laureates 2001-2025 are currently in use. I think we should replace them with this one - it's not unwieldy by any means. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:45, 26 January 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 22:03, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 03:54, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.