Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 February 23



Template:Euro-myth-top

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per CSD G2. Non-admin closure. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:03, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Seems to serve no useful purpose and be unused. Bringing here rather than speedying in case someone can show that it does have a reason for existing. Grutness...wha?  22:39, 23 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete: Do I even need to explain the basis of my opinion on this one? I think the template's clear lack of purpose speaks for itself. Delete. --Sgt. R.K. Blue (talk) 05:41, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as G2 - This template seems to be like a test page. -Porchcrop (talk 06:30, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I find it odd that you actually declined a G2 speedy on the template. Normally, admins will delete obvious G2 cases, even while a TfD is running. If it helps, I'll close this TfD and re-nominate for CSD G2. — This, that, and the other (talk) 05:51, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * That's fine by me - I almost G2'd it originally, but didn't know whether it was a template subst'd somewhere for arcane reasons. Grutness...wha?  21:46, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:CharlotteRetiredJerseys

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 22:56, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Delete - WikiProject College Basketball's consensus was to eliminate navboxes for retired and/or honored jerseys. Jrcla2 (talk) 21:35, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:UK Upfront Club Chart

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 22:57, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Delete. With all but one article/list that was included in this navbox deleted, there is no use for the template. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 07:35, 23 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete: Per nomination. Plus I wouldn't be surprised if the 2011 article is soon nominated for deletion as well. --Sgt. R.K. Blue (talk) 05:35, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.