Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 February 8



Template:Othermss

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman  ✈  08:06, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Seems to looks like a hatnote. Here is the demo: →  ( will do the job, as always). Speedy? DePiep (talk) 23:04, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete This seems oddly specific and little-used. --Cyber cobra (talk) 02:58, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Distinguish3

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman  ✈  08:08, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Suggests hatnote. Produces: →  No addition to what is. Speedy? DePiep (talk) 23:04, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment it appears to be a compositing hatnote, which requires another hatnote template to be used first. 65.94.45.238 (talk) 05:45, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
 * ... but has no starting captial. -DePiep (talk) 11:17, 9 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete This seems to be unused and of dubious usefulness. --Cyber cobra (talk) 03:05, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Films of Cem Yýlmaz

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman  ✈  08:10, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Unused, redundant to Template:Films of Cem Yılmaz (spelling listed on page) EmanWilm (talk) 22:56, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Nikhilitres: A unit of measurement that has been invented by and can only be used by Nikhil Budhkar

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedily deleted per WP:CSD#G3. Rodhull andemu  21:38, 8 February 2011 (UTC)



Unused template of no use whatsoever John of Reading (talk) 21:23, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:TWCoopers

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Superseded by Torchwood, and generally not necessary. (Non-admin closure - if some of these old discussions aren't closed, TfD is going to begin to mount up hugely.) — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:30, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

This navbox is too small to be of much use, given that it only navigates between a couple of main articles and subsections of the List of Torchwood characters. It's largely redundant as it duplicates information already in the main Torchwood navbox, and is unlikely to grow much in size. Rodhull andemu  14:50, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Awful, well-meaning template. Also, the three articles (Gwen, Rhys, list) don't have any special or conspicuous connection beyond those already stated in the prose of those articles!~ZytheTalk to me! 16:06, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Other places2

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Redirect to Other places (non-admin closure) → ♠ Gƒoley ↔ Four ♣ ← 18:27, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
 * other places2
 * other places

Propose merging Template:Other places2 with Template:Other places.

Hatnotes. Both produce the same text: →     →   Propose merge other places2 into other places. That is: Redirect T:op2 to T:op with unchanged parameter. Code difference: T:op2 has no default for missing parameter 1=, where T:op uses as default. Since T:op2 will always have a 1st parameter, no break expected. Both are pp now, I've asked editprotected assistance for T:op2. T:op will not be touched, so no request there (TfM in /doc). DePiep (talk) 02:17, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Soundtrack of O Brother, Where Art Thou?

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep (non-admin closure) → ♠ Gƒoley ↔ Four ♣ ← 17:52, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

First of all, the title of this template is incorrect; these are not "soundtracks" of the film, these are some of the songs which appeared on said soundtrack. But, since we have an article for that soundtrack, I do not see how this template offers anything new for purposes of navigation or research.  RepublicanJacobite  The'FortyFive' 00:02, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep and improve. I think we should keep it and edited to improve it for the purpose of navigation between the songs of that soundtrack and the main page. I do not see anything wrong with it, but rather it could be utilized as a quick "root" reference. I do not think that it should be deleted just because its title is incorrect, that is not such a big deal. Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 14:45, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.