Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 January 19



Template:Just Cause

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman  ✈  13:26, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Just 2 links, I don't think this justifies a template. Axem Titanium (talk) 22:46, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete with haste. Most egregious case of WP:NENAN ever. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 20:27, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Good faith creation, but I think they misunderstood the function of navboxes. -- &oelig; &trade; 07:38, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: only two pages on navbox, both of which already have links to each-other. CR4ZE (talk) 13:43, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Mayday (Taiwanese Band)

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete.

This template is a duplicate of Template:Mayday. Michaela den (talk) 19:45, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per A10 or G6, take your pick. Duplicates are speediable. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 20:24, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Transjakarta halts navbox

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman  ✈  13:31, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia WP:NOT applies - I know of no other project that has bus-stop articles based on a single web page source - and I know of no reason as to why there is a need for such detail in an online encyclopedia - a project like this is out of scope of what WP:ABOUT describes SatuSuro 08:24, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - is there a 100 red linked bus stops in that template? The template is merely about subjects that will never meet notability requirements. --Merbabu (talk) 08:48, 19 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Nick-D (talk) 09:28, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, speedy, per above. --Elekhh (talk) 10:12, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete --Rochelimit (talk) 19:01, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:EnergyNT

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Airplaneman  ✈  13:29, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Unused navbox. Nearly all red. Mhiji 22:03, 10 January 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 04:56, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete due to all the redlinks. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 06:18, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, all the information is in Power_and_Water_Corporation, so nothing would be lost. 134.253.26.11 (talk) 22:54, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Drunk

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep (non-admin closure) → ♠ Gƒoley ↔ Four ♣ ← 03:14, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Unused. No substitutions. Mhiji 02:17, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 04:36, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak keep I'm sure some people would prefer to know about something other than cookies. Document into "cookies" as an alternate. 65.94.71.179 (talk) 05:14, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. Agree with IP above, I'm sure users would appreciate having a larger variety of templates to choose from, depending on what they want to express. Besides, "no uses" is a poor reason to delete any of these kinds of WikiLove templates, just because it hasn't been used yet doesn't mean it won't ever. -- &oelig; &trade; 07:43, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Departments San Luis

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete both. Airplaneman  ✈  13:22, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Useless navbox. All red links. Mhiji 02:07, 11 January 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 04:30, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Comment, appears to be part of Category:Argentina department (country subdivision) templates Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 04:30, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Beautiful Small Machines
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 02:24, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

both the EP and band has been recently deleted. Articles for deletion/Beautiful Small Machines. blatantly non notable so not worthy of a template LibStar (talk) 00:27, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.