Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 January 27



Template:Cata

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 06:24, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

User specific template. Due to the rather annoying styling, should be deleted and transclusions removed, rather than moving to userspace. WOSlinker (talk) 19:14, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Remove (not subst) transclusions and delete. Useless. It is not necessary to place a big red box on a talk page whenever you add a category to an article. This should go away. — This, that, and the other (talk) 23:23, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Substitute. This template is used as a talk page comment, particularly parameter 2. Deletion would have the effect of deleting talk page messages. --Bsherr (talk) 14:51, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * An unnecessary talk page comment, I might add. — This, that, and the other (talk) 08:40, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Categorybrowsebaroneline

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Merge into Categorybrowsebar. If someone wants to try to merge it with Browsebar, go right ahead. No prejudice against renomination. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 15:54, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

All in a similar style to the portal browsebar but in this case for categories. None very widely used. May be a slight case to keep one but no need for four of them. WOSlinker (talk) 19:06, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Category header

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 06:26, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Unmaintained template. Still contains a reference to PAGENAME for category sorting which is no longer needed. The Template category template is more informative as a category header template. WOSlinker (talk) 18:56, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete or fix and make useful and generic, seems un-useful offering partial advice, and a generic name to a specific template. Could be useful if made good, and if there are categories that regularly get edited to add members. Rich Farmbrough, 19:32, 27th day of January in the year 2011 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Category also

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Boldly redirected, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 17:08, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Only used once. Could be replaced with See also WOSlinker (talk) 18:50, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Template:Category see also. Rich Farmbrough, 19:25, 27th day of January in the year 2011 (UTC).


 * Redirect per Rich. 184.144.169.126 (talk) 05:43, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:CavTel

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete after replacement. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 06:14, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Transclusions could be replaced with WOSlinker (talk) 18:42, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Redundant to . Not needed. — This, that, and the other (talk)  06:29, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Replace with or retransclude, then delete. --Bsherr (talk) 14:54, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

ASEAN Football Championship squad templates

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete all. Regional competition. These tend to get to be overkill when used for regional competitions. User:Woohookitty Disamming fool! 12:05, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

The competition for which these squad navboxes were created is a regional competition only, whereas the general consensus at WP:FOOTY is that national team squad navboxes should only be created for continental or global competitions such as the AFC Asian Cup or the FIFA World Cup. Banana Fingers (talk) 14:58, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Banana Fingers (talk) 15:35, 27 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete all - per similar TfDs and consensus at WP:FOOTY. I believe several of these have been deleted following TfDs before. Jogurney (talk) 14:21, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete all Not the major regional event and per nom. Matthew_hk   t  c  17:53, 29 January 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Hum

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 15:47, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Template for band with no indication of notability. Dialectric (talk) 11:55, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * There. I cleaned up the red links and added a note for each item as to its notability (which I assume is what you meant). Some of these songs (the higher-charting singles like "Stars", "Comin' Home", etc.) should be developed into separate pages, which I don't have time for at the moment. Wikkitywack (talk) 20:21, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment if this is kept, it should be renamed to match the article Hum (band) for Hum (band) since this template has nothing to do with Hum. 184.144.169.126 (talk) 05:55, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I disagree. The qualifier is unnecessary in this case because none of those other Hum things listed on the disambiguation page have a need for any kind of template. Wikkitywack (talk) 06:37, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Rfctag-alt
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 15:35, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Unused (in terms of transclusions). This is probably a bad thing. It's invisible, so users may not remember to remove it when the RfC is over. The box that rfctag provides is important to show that the RfC is active and listed. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:50, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Rfant
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 06:17, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Unused (and only ever substed once. Apparently this was "Created [...] to make it easier to distinguish between open transcluded RfA's amd open non-transcluded RfA's as they look the same without this template." This doesn't make sense. This template looks no different when substed and transcluded. Why do we need this? — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:50, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Dauphines of France (House of Bourbon)
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 15:34, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Unnecessary, unused specific subset of Dauphines of France. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:47, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.