Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 January 31



Template:Honduras Squad 2011 Copa Centroamericana

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 03:49, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Templates to major tournaments such as CONCACAF Gold Cup, AFC Asian Cup, UEFA Euro, CAF Cup of Nations, and OFC Championship should only be created.  GoPurple  'n  Gold24   23:05, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per previous consensus. Copa Centroamericana is not major. — This, that, and the other (talk) 05:58, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Howtoedit

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 03:50, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Obsolete part from old protection template. Few remaining uses can easily be substituted. Note: couldn't add tag to page due to protection. The Evil IP address (talk) 17:55, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I've added the tfd -- WOSlinker (talk) 19:25, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does appear to be obsolete. --Bsherr (talk) 05:34, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Howtoeditsemi

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 03:55, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Obsolete part of old protection template. Few remaining uses can easily be substituted. Note: couldn't add tag to page because it's protected. --The Evil IP address (talk) 17:51, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I've added the tfd -- WOSlinker (talk) 19:25, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does appear to be obsolete. --Bsherr (talk) 05:34, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

infobox IPA base (and more)

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 03:56, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

The first, infobox IPA base, is now replaced by Infobox IPA. Has no uses in mainspace anymore. The two /sound subtemplates are put out of use because their main template uses the new IPA soundbox instead of old IPAsound. The fourth, Pulmonic consonants with audio, is a under-developed functional copy of IPA pulmonics audio. A test, and not used. This one also uses old IPAsound. Together, deletion is preferred above maintenance into using the newer IPA soundbox template. Note on dependency: all these four templates depend on IPAsound, which itself is now deprecated and at TfD since January 27. Clean and easy deletion implies that one first deletes the dependent templates, and then the master (i.e. IPAsound). DePiep (talk) 17:13, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - seems pretty routine. — Æµ§œš¹  [aɪm ˈfɹ̠ˤʷɛ̃ɾ̃ˡi] 17:57, 31 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete all, and then delete IPAsound. —Angr (talk) 20:34, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:ImageDispute

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was redirect Plastikspork ―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 02:07, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Unused, redundant to non-free. The Evil IP address (talk) 10:53, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Recommend a redirect as the template title is something our editors may actually type in a search. "Image Dispute" i would suspect would be a more common search parameter then "non free". Moxy (talk) 20:09, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:GovLeadership
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 04:07, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Redundant to Forms of government, unused. The Evil IP address (talk) 10:40, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not useful. Poorly made. Redundant. Not necessary. — This, that, and the other (talk) 05:59, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:YRUU
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 04:07, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Unused template that doesn't appear to be particularly useful. Only used once on an old userpage, where it should be substituted. The Evil IP address (talk) 10:34, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Inscrutable, and, as nom says, not very useful. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:12, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - as a member of WP:UU, the workgroup that would be most likely to make use of this template, I see no need for it. Lady  of  Shalott  16:30, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:SF
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 04:20, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Redundant with Science fiction, where all those links should go into. The Evil IP address (talk) 10:32, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Orphan and delete. Indeed, seems redundant with the footer navigation box. --Bsherr (talk) 05:38, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Orphan and Redirect to science fiction since SF is a very common abbreviation for the same. 65.93.12.249 (talk) 06:18, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:ManyImages
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 04:10, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Unused. Creator blocked. Inapproriate style for an ambox by any means. This is a rare concern that probably does not merit an ambox anyway. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:02, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete – Unused and redundant. --Bsherr (talk) 05:45, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Maritime Canadian music
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 04:11, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Another one of these bizarre catch-all " -boxes". Partially superseded by Music of Canada. But the point is, it's not useful. No scope for it to be used. Virtually none of it has anything to do with Canadian Maritime music, anyway. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:58, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Exactly one link is relevant to "Maritime music". Seems  is much better for this. Resolute 17:47, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator.  — Soap  —  17:59, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Resolute.Moxy (talk) 08:34, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - I agree with Resolute. -- Joaquin008  ( talk ) 20:01, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 16:51, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Mark Joseph
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 02:05, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Unused. WP:NENAN. (By the way, the correct article is Mark Joseph (singer), not the one linked from the header.) — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:54, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Clearly delete. Frietjes (talk) 19:35, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:The Kingdom Keepers
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 02:11, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Template with only 3 articles and a redirect to the main article. All of the articles are linked in the main article. WP:NENAN. -- LoЯd  ۞pεth  01:04, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.