Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 July 20



Template:Infobox Province Vietnam

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_ Zero 19:43, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Clunky, overly specific, orphaned template. Should use Infobox settlement. Calliopejen1 (talk) 13:13, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (User: Pigsonthewing ); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 13:16, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiProject Greater Albany/Savannah/Valdosta (South Georgia)

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_ Zero 19:12, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Unneeded project banner template. WikiProject Greater Albany/Savannah/Valdosta (South Georgia) has been converted into task force of WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state). JJ98 (Talk / Contributions)  10:12, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Misspelling

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Will replace existing transclusions with distinguish and recreate the page as a redirect to that template. RL0919 (talk) 19:24, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Redundant to distinguish, not in wide use. Cyber cobra (talk) 06:12, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. The first three words of the noms ratio say it all. -DePiep (talk) 06:28, 20 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Since it links to an actual article, its not a misspelling because it is used on a actual article itself.Curb Chain (talk) 12:00, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - redundant, and easily abused to push a point of view about "correctness" of the spelling of something. — SMcCandlish  Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ  Contribs. 01:50, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Mohsen Yeganeh

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Underpopulated navbox. --RL0919 (talk) 19:54, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

WP:NENAN, this is a navigational template for a music artist consists of one bluelink, the artist, and a bunch of redlinks. Aspects (talk) 01:51, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - too few articles to justify a navbox. Robofish (talk) 22:37, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:ChefMoz

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 00:25, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

ChefMoz has been dead for years and is overrun with outdated and spammy content--it's not useful to link to it. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:45, 20 July 2011 (UTC)


 * With only three transclusions this wouldn't be worth preserving even if the site were still active IMO. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 09:17, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 23:49, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.