Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 June 14



Template:Gthumbar Group

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete Plastikspork (talk) 00:59, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

not a template. ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ Share– a– Power[citation needed] 16:08, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, speedy if possible. I don't normally read TFD so I don't know if you see a lot of nominations here as explicitly useless as this, but it seems quite silly to me to have to go through a discussion process to delete 20 incoherent bytes of gibberish simply because it has the Template: prefix. Theoldsparkle (talk) 18:19, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I tagged it with template:db-test. Frietjes (talk) 22:22, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Jonas wehr thailand)

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete Plastikspork (talk) 00:59, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

not a template. ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ Share– a– Power[citation needed] 16:05, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, speedy if possible per my comments on the above nomination. Theoldsparkle (talk) 18:20, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I tagged it with template:db-test. Frietjes (talk) 22:23, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Midland Combination Two

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 06:40, 22 June 2011 (UTC)



Does not link any articles at all. Appears only on Midland Football Combination, which already contains this info in text form and does not need it duplicated as a template -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:27, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - most definitely a redundant template. &mdash;BETTIA&mdash; talk 15:36, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - It's an easy task to re-create the template if a known team ever ends in this league division again. Greverod (talk) 17:20, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Absolutely no need for it. Argyle 4 Life  talk  17:26, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:In to cm

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. JPG-GR (talk) 06:39, 22 June 2011 (UTC)



Here's another redundant & unused template. Here are its subroutines.

J IM ptalk·cont 05:22, 14 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Superseded. Add any unique options to convert and delete.  Lord Vetinari  07:39, 14 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete: per nominator (and my based own nomination below). OSX (talk • contributions) 08:13, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Automotive conversion templates

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was convert, then delete. JPG-GR (talk) 06:42, 22 June 2011 (UTC)



The function of these templates have now been fully integrated into convert. Back in September 2009 the other automotive conversion templates were deleted, however, these were retained because at the time their functionality could not be emulated using convert.

Articles currently using the above templates will require a bot to translate the conversions into the new template. OSX (talk • contributions) 02:16, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - after bot changes -- >Typ932 T&middot;C 03:58, 14 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete: Let the bot substitue them then delete all of them. J IM ptalk·cont 05:27, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.