Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 June 23



Template:Infobox Philippine Presidential election, 2010

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 00:24, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Unused. Unneeded. Not relevant to the Philippine election. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:42, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Croats of Bosnia and Herzegovina infobox

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 00:23, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Single-use template, forked from Croats of Bosnia and Herzegovina for no apparent reason (actually, there was a reason -- it was created by now indefblocked User:Wustenfuchs to sneak the image of Ante Pavelić in). I substed it into that page, where it is more easily maintained, so it is not necessary anymore. No such user (talk) 10:34, 23 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Per nominator. Adrian (talk) 15:11, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ronald Shiner

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 00:23, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Previous consensus show that actors should not have their filmography as a navigation template.  Lugnuts  (talk) 07:45, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Actors should not have an expansive list of their work.Curb Chain (talk) 14:07, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Non-Germanic van name

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 00:23, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Only used in 1 article; use-case seems pretty obscure. --Cyber cobra (talk) 06:56, 23 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Indeed. Hatnotes are not disclaimers, and this one is worse than most family-name templates of the sort. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 10:33, 23 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete (as creator). Never propagated, and the purpose this once served has been obviated by Persondata anyway. — SMcCandlish  Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ  Contribs. 18:46, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.