Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 March 11



Template:WikiProject Space

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep and mark historical (Non-admin closure). JJ98 (Talk)  11:21, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Unused template, WP:SPACE is now defunct. JJ98 (Talk)  18:56, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Holy smokes, the replacement it done? Awesome! Anyway, now that it's unused, can't we just redirect it to WikiProject Spaceflight? Looking at the template history brings back good memories.. (*nostalgia*). I'm not sure I see the purpose in deleting it.. Mlm42 (talk) 19:05, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, its already done, it has been replaced by WikiProject Astronomy, WikiProject Solar System and WikiProject Spaceflight. I don't think a redirect is necessary. JJ98 (Talk)  23:25, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * You're right, a redirect isn't necessary.. but on the other hand, neither is deleting it? By the way, do you know why there are thousands of page that link to this template? I haven't been able to figure it out.. Mlm42 (talk) 03:38, 12 March 2011 (UTC)


 * mark historic. Add a red warning box to it so that any transclusion will warn the editor to replace the box. This template was used a long time by many users, so a notice about the new templates to use would be appropriate to leave around. And as long as we don't delete the WP:SPACE project page, I don't see any reason not to keep this around to point people to the current templates, provided that it has a transclusion notice to replace it when used. 184.144.160.156 (talk) 06:37, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree with an IP, I think it should be marked as historic, just like the expand template. I that case, this template shouldn't be deleted. JJ98 (Talk)  08:41, 12 March 2011 (UTC)


 * Support Historic marking - seems the least disruptive of ways to deal with it. Would oppose redirecting it to WP:SPACEFLIGHT, as many projects have used it. Colds7ream (talk) 18:39, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Retain for historic purposes, no further application, but there are hundreds of references to it in past discussions, and many users are used to using it, so if nothing else it could become some form of template-space disambiguation page between the three templates that have replaced it. -- G W … 21:11, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep and mark historical per the others. Also, I like 184.144.160.156's suggestion. — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 07:25, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep for history: I think it should be kept because of its historical value. Will allow people to see where we have been and came to in not a very long time.-- Navy Blue84  17:20, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep and mark history per above.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 17:11, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Button

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 06:24, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

This was proposed for deletion in December 2010, but was kept as "Under construction". It's now March, and nothing has happened. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:48, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 17:16, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Honduran Liga Nacional squad templates

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 06:21, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Templates consist of 50 percent red links and are not employed on any other pages than their respective season articles (2009–10 Honduran Liga Nacional and 2010–11 Honduran Liga Nacional). Further, consensus at WP:FOOTY is not to have any season squad templates, except for national team squads which participated in the final tournament of a World Cup/Gold Cup/Euro/etc. Soccer-holicI hear voices in my head... 15:31, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - there's no such thing as "season squads" - players come and go. Definitely not needed. GiantSnowman 15:42, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Soccer-holicI hear voices in my head... 15:44, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - this kind of templates are not needed, but the work would get lost, so I suggest making from 2010–11 Honduran Liga Nacional squads 10 current squad templates. Pelmeen10 (talk) 08:05, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:SearchImages

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete — G FOLEY   F OUR  — 23:11, 18 March 2011 (UTC) Remember to add Tfd tags to the template you are tagging for deletion.

Fails WP:ELNO, unused. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 08:06, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 17:17, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Location of Székely Land

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 06:20, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Purpose unclear; does nothing in its base state. Unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:56, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Support The user that created this template is inactive on WP these months. It seems the template was created by mistake or its author gave it up (Iaaasi (talk) 07:03, 11 March 2011 (UTC))

Support I agree with Iaaasi. Unless the template is improved, it may be deleted, origibnally I wanted to create location map. Rokarudi--Rokarudi (talk) 11:00, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Long Beach, California

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete — G FOLEY   F OUR  — 23:16, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Well-linked articles which do not need a navbox. Unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:55, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 17:17, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:LogicInv

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete as T3. NAC. &mdash; Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 01:34, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

An announcement for the proper creation of a new WikiProject, which occurred in 2008. No longer needed. No transclusions. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:55, 11 March 2011 (UTC)


 * No objection Greg Bard (talk) 04:45, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.