Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 March 31



Template:Infobox Pro Football player coach

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 00:50, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Unused. We have other infoboxes for sportperson which do the job just fine. Magioladitis (talk) 23:06, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (User: Pigsonthewing ); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 10:16, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Unused. -- WOSlinker (talk) 06:25, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Pro snowboarder

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 00:50, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Unused. Created 2 years ago and never used. I guess because Infobox sportsperson does the job just fine. Magioladitis (talk) 23:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (User: Pigsonthewing ); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 10:16, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Unused. -- WOSlinker (talk) 06:25, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox rally driver

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 00:50, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Only 4 transclusions. If not only redundant to Infobox racing driver it can be easily merged to it. Magioladitis (talk) 22:56, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (User: Pigsonthewing ); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 10:16, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Vovinam player

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 02:34, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

No transclusions. Judging by the fields really used in the only transclusion, Infobox athlete can cover it. Magioladitis (talk) 13:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Frietjes (talk) 22:25, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett (User: Pigsonthewing ); Andy's talk; Andy's edits 22:35, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Bulgunnia

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 02:33, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

The template's content is just the word "Bulgunnia". It is not used anywhere. There really should be a speedy deletion criterion for such a pointless template (as there is for an article: db-nocontent) but there isn't, so I'm bringing it here. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:20, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Seems to be related to an article with coi issue.  Maimai  009  14:10, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.