Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 May 10



Template:England Gov 1899

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Magioladitis (talk) 07:45, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

unused. Frietjes (talk) 20:04, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Lightmouse (talk) 08:18, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Mr. and Miss Basketball awards

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Magioladitis (talk) 07:47, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy delete - High school sports awards, unless they're major/national awards, do not deserve templates. I know for a fact there have been deleted templates in the past that set precedent, but I don't remember when. Also, it's an unused template to begin with. This amounts to navbox clutter even if it were to be used. Jrcla2 (talk) 17:44, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, doesn't need a navbox. The article is enough. Frietjes (talk) 20:27, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete but not exactly for the reason that nominator mentioned, but because this Navbox contains no more than two active links. (The rest are red links.) They don't need a navbox; article is enough. Fleet Command (talk) 04:57, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox BiH Canton

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Magioladitis (talk) 07:47, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

cut-and-paste copy of template:infobox settlement. Frietjes (talk) 17:35, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Lightmouse (talk) 08:18, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Insurgency in the Republic of Macedonia

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Magioladitis (talk) 07:52, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Insurgency in the Republic of Macedonia has an infobox, this one is not used. Frietjes (talk) 17:24, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Lightmouse (talk) 08:18, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Kingdom of Croatia

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Orphaned, unused and redundant to another template. Magioladitis (talk) 22:36, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

copy of template:infobox former country. Frietjes (talk) 17:08, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Lightmouse (talk) 08:18, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:StarWarsDroids

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Magioladitis (talk) 07:56, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

There are currently only four articles in the subtemplate (not including the list of SW characters), and all are already located in Template:Star Wars characters. While this was a good idea in the ol' days, time has weeded out plenty of the original articles and droid-specific ones, so I do not think there are enough articles to properly distinguish this from the ordinary template for Star Wars characters. Harry Blue5 (talk • contribs) 14:12, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - I agree. It may have been useful at one point. If there was a chance it would be useful again, it would be better to redirect it and preserve history, but I doubt enough droids will be notable enough again for a whole navbox. Blake (Talk·Edits) 14:36, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as superfluous. --EEMIV (talk) 17:12, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:University Dance Marathons

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 23:10, 21 May 2011 (UTC)

This template links to two articles (Northwestern University Dance Marathon and Penn State IFC/Panhellenic Dance Marathon) and one redirect (Dance Marathon at UCLA, which redirects to UCLA). The only pages that use this template are those two linked articles. This template is too small, as per Navigation templates. A "see also" link between the two articles should be used instead of the template. OCNative (talk) 06:20, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Lightmouse (talk) 08:18, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Maskinen

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Main argument is WP:NENAN. Magioladitis (talk) 11:17, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Not much need for a template for a band with only one album and no single with articles. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 05:35, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, not enough for navigation. Frietjes (talk) 20:27, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Lightmouse (talk) 08:18, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Flash builders

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Magioladitis (talk) 07:49, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

A subset of Template:Adobe Flash and therefore redundant. Fleet Command (talk) 04:40, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Lightmouse (talk) 08:18, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Mixed By Jeff Kollman

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete. Meaningless - appears to be a test edit. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:40, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Template is not used in any meaningful way. See discussion for Template:Produced By The Crumb Bros. Jeff Kollman & Mark Renk, below. Drmies (talk) 01:47, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Looks like a test edit to me. I don't know why should someone care to write instead of Mixed By Jeff Kollman when both reproduce the same thing. Fleet Command (talk) 05:53, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete As far as usability goes. Phearson (talk) 10:30, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.