Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 May 18



Template:Shake It Up

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 02:06, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Small template with only 3 articles, all of them linked in the main article. WP:NENAN. -- LoЯd  ۞pεth  19:40, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy-delete. The only reason that we have navboxes in Wikipedia is to aid users navigate between contextually-connected articles. But a navbox can never aid users navigate within an article better a table contents that is automatically inserted into articles. Fleet Command (talk) 17:25, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Webcachedlinks

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 02:07, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Unused template, Concern is that this might now mis-represent policy. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:50, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy-Delete per Criteria for speedy deletion – G1: Patent Nonsense. Fleet Command (talk) 17:28, 19 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Could be useful in the future.Curb Chain (talk) 08:56, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Fleet Command. Frietjes (talk) 22:22, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
 * weak Delete instead of adding this template, links (I think of google cache in this case) should be archived by webcite or the normal links should be used. mabdul 22:44, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * You are completely right. And this template says: DON'T! It basically says: "Wikipedia is evil intelligence agency! If something is vanished, then it existence must be denied."Fleet Command (talk) 05:38, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Super Robot Monkey Team Hyperforce Go!

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 02:08, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Unused template, links only into two articles. JJ98 (Talk)  00:22, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Frietjes (talk) 22:22, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.