Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 April 12



Template:Campaignbox Salvadoran Civil War

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, as it is orphaned, and there appear to be no major objections. Can be recreated if there is a need for it. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 04:01, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Campaignbox Salvadoran Civil War

An incomplete nomination from December 16, 2010‎.

Navbox with only two items; WP:NENAN. (I know it's really a campaignbox, but I don't feel it is that useful now, since I have added sufficiently interlinking between the two articles.) Unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:45, 12 April 2012 (UTC)


 * My understanding was that we treated campaign boxes differently from normal navboxes and thus they could be present even if they didn't link anywhere at all. In that case this should probably be retained even if has negligible actual navigational value. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 12:20, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * So long as both the items in the campaign box are in the article, I have no problem with deleting it. It looks like one item is in there, but I didn't see the other.Publicus 15:53, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Yeah; I'm not actually sure how much connection there is between the Zona Rosa attacks and the Civil War. I added a mention of the Civil War to the lead of the Zona Rosa article, but only to say that the attacks were "during" the Civil War, not that they were related. Unfortunately, WP:ELSALV seems to be dormant; is there anyone else who would know? — This, that, and the other (talk) 02:35, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Short filename

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as T3 by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:09, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Short filename

This template inserts files into Category:Files with short filenames which is a redundant category as here are never enough files in either category to have both that and Category:Wikipedia files requiring renaming. I believe that we do not need this template. Also, with Template:Rename media for you can specify a reason, and that would be the appropriate place to list a rename because of a short name. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 00:51, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Being short is not, in and of itself, an acceptable reason for renaming a file. See Filemover.  S ven M anguard   Wha?  00:59, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment I've also nominated the Category that this feeds into: Categories for discussion/Log/2012 April 12-- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 01:05, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:The Wild Thornberrys

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 04:01, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The Wild Thornberrys

Links into four articles. Not a good navbox. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions)  00:19, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, textbook WP:NENAN. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:56, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.