Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 August 8



Template:Liberty_ship_list_section

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 03:10, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Liberty_ship_list_section
 * Liberty ship by hull list section close
 * Liberty ship class (boxed aircraft transport)
 * Liberty ship class (collier)
 * Liberty ship class (tank transport)
 * Liberty ship class (tanker)

All unused. DH85868993 (talk) 14:37, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Kawasaki Motors Racing

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 03:10, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Kawasaki Motors Racing

Unused. Team has morphed into Forward Racing, which has its own template (Forward Racing). DH85868993 (talk) 14:11, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. --Biker Biker (talk) 23:16, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Joint Operations series

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 03:12, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Joint Operations series

Unused. All three links redirect to Joint Operations: Typhoon Rising, so template does not actually provide any navigation. DH85868993 (talk) 13:59, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NENAN. --Izno (talk) 23:59, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Rly gds stn

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 03:13, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Rly gds stn

Unused. Creates links to articles named "xxx railway goods station". There are a couple of articles named like that (Park Lane railway goods station, North Mersey railway goods station) but there are other railway goods stations articles which aren't named that way (e.g. Witney railway station (goods)), so I question the usefulness. Possibly redundant to some other more general railway template? DH85868993 (talk) 12:36, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:TableItem4

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 03:13, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * TableItem4

Creates one row of a 4-column table. Allows you to write:

instead of
 * |A||B||C||D
 * |A||B||C||D

Not sure how much of an advantage that is. Only used in one article. Subst & delete? DH85868993 (talk) 12:31, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment if it is kept, it should be moved to TableItem and made generic as to how many columns it can create -- 70.24.247.242 (talk) 04:15, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Subst and delete -- 70.24.247.242 (talk) 04:16, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Sfd relist top
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:04, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Sfd relist top
 * Sfd relist bottom

Unused. Related to obsolete SfD process. DH85868993 (talk) 12:22, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ranking list
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 03:23, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Ranking list

Only used in User:Smartskaft/Sandbox. Delete or userfy? DH85868993 (talk) 12:15, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:PJHI
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 03:37, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * PJHI

Created in 2005. Only used in user signatures on a 2006 CfD and a 2005 discussion on a user talk page. DH85868993 (talk) 12:12, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Football box header
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 03:44, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Football box header

Intended as a header for tables composed of multiple Football box. But only used in 1 article, whereas there are many articles which use Football box, suggesting that perhaps the header isn't really necessary. DH85868993 (talk) 12:05, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Shrek chronology
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 03:46, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Shrek chronology

Redundant. Template:Shrek is enough. Silvergoat (talk∙contrib) 11:33, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ten Longest Interstate Highways
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. G7. --Rschen7754 04:22, 8 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Ten Longest Interstate Highways

Considering that we already have Interstates, and combined with the trivial scope, and lack of sourcing, this template is highly problematic. Rschen7754 03:59, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Being one of the X longest isn't a defining characteristic, and if a reader wants to see what the longest (or shortest) Interstates are, we have List of Interstate Highways.  Imzadi 1979   →   04:02, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - can the article List of Interstate Highways sort by length of highway? It would be nice if it did as there is no way to have a list sorted that way at the present. The "interstates" template currently highlights I-45 and I-30 as "major" interstates in yellow which is somewhat misleading as to which ones are longer.  I don't mind getting rid of this template as long as we have a way to sort it by length.  Thanks. --J30dkks (talk) 04:06, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Repaired; the table was broken. --Rschen7754 04:07, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Remember that "major"≠long; AASHTO determines the major Interstates based on the number assigned to them.  Imzadi 1979  →   04:09, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok... thanks all. Please feel free to delete the template.  --J30dkks (talk) 04:11, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:EmphasisBox
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 01:50, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * EmphasisBox
 * EmphasisBox/start
 * EmphasisBox/end
 * EmphasisBox/style
 * TitledBox/start

EmphasisBox is unused. The others are only trancluded by each other and/or User talk:Tomtomn00/ROWikiBackup/Tomtomn00. Note that there is no TitledBox. Purpose unclear. DH85868993 (talk) 03:46, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.