Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 December 18



Template:Future TV show

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 17:13, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Future TV show

Created by User:Doracake specifically for Dokidoki! PreCure, which the creator put also put in. No other upcoming television show uses this template. WP:NODISCLAIMERS. Cyan Gardevoir (used EDIT!) 23:27, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. "Future" templates have been deprecated per this discussion three years ago. The preferred method now is to simply categorize such shows in Category:Upcoming television series. -- Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 01:40, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment - This template doesn't meet any of the speedy deletion criteria. ❤ Yutsi Talk/  Contributions  ( 偉特 ) 18:35, 19 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Strong delete per the discussion cited by Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars. ❤ Yutsi Talk/  Contributions  ( 偉特 ) 18:35, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment - The template I put was to warn the editors who add too much information that can't be sourced about these articles, and categories don't really matter, unless there are other usable existed templates I didn't know . --Doracake (talk) 18:40, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
 * That would fall under WP:V, which applies to every article. -- Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 01:35, 21 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete: This stuff was eliminated years ago for a reason.— Ryulong ( 琉竜 ) 18:18, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete because Heart Catch was the bes--... err, because what everyone else said... Yeah, that's it... nothing to see here. -- Ned Scott 12:43, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cr-PPL

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:14, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Cr-PPL

Essentially a word-for-word copy of the Lahore Lions article, in the template namespace. Unused.  Super Mario  Man  20:26, 18 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete per nom. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 20:35, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:58, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Fastest trains in India

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 17:13, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Fastest trains in India

Not a suitable template and it is transcluded in the Express trains in India article, which is a good place for the info. The contents of the template will need copying before deletion. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 19:43, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Subst and delete per nom. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 22:00, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Subst and delete since it's only used on one page. ❤ Yutsi Talk/  Contributions  ( 偉特 ) 18:36, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Did you know nominations/BEAUTY GRADE MACHINE

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete — obvious test page, article in non-article space, and spam. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 09:01, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Did you know nominations/BEAUTY GRADE MACHINE

WP:DYK nomination page for a non-existent article.  Super Mario  Man  19:34, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete The article would be deleted if real as a promotional. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:59, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Zuidtangent

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 17:16, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Zuidtangent

Just hard-coded text, used only once. This sort of extra layer in content impedes maintenance without any benefit, so the template should be substed and deleted Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:17, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Subst and delete per nom. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:58, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Taxbracket

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 17:19, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Taxbracket

Unused template, which seems too specialised to be likely to be used. It is categorised only in Netherlands templates, so it may once have been used in some Netherlands-related article. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:14, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:56, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NetherlandsPop

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 17:20, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
 * NetherlandsPop
 * NetherlandsPopCommas

Unused templates, redundant to Data Netherlands. (Both of these are just hardcoded instances of Data Netherlands). Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:05, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:55, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Well they were created long ago, now they are redundant. I agree to deleting them.--RoadTrain (talk) 13:08, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
 * RoadTrain was the creator of both these templates. -- Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 13:00, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Montreal municipal political party colour templates
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 17:28, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Canadian politics/Montreal municipal/Colour ACM
 * Canadian politics/Montreal municipal/Colour EPM
 * Canadian politics/Montreal municipal/Colour MPP
 * Canadian politics/Montreal municipal/Colour PM
 * Canadian politics/Montreal municipal/Colour PMVM
 * Canadian politics/Montreal municipal/Colour PVL
 * Canadian politics/Montreal municipal/Colour UM
 * Canadian politics/Montreal municipal/Colour VM

None of these are being used on any page. All of their functionality can be replicated by Template:Canadian party colour. There is no reason to keep them for subsitution because the contents of the templates are shorter than the template names. There is no reason to keep them for their histories because they have had few-to-no edits and few-to-no mentions on talk pages. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 07:42, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:57, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment how have they been replaced by Canadian party colour? All I see are big red X's on the documentation -- 70.24.247.127 (talk) 23:01, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I assume you're talking about the documentation at Template:Canadian politics/party colours. The TfD template I put on these templaes' pages when I nominated them broke that table, so I put X's in the table as placeholders. All pages in the article space that used to use these, such as Rosemont–La Petite-Patrie, now use "Canadian party colour". —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 23:21, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, that's what I meant. Thanks for the example of usage. -- 70.24.247.127 (talk) 00:25, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Remaining Canada political party shortname templates
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 17:29, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Co-operative Commonwealth Federation/meta/shortname
 * Coalition of Progressive Electors/meta/shortname
 * Conservative Party of Canada (historical)/meta/shortname
 * Green Party of Vancouver/meta/color
 * Green Party of Vancouver/meta/shortname
 * Liberal Party of Canada/meta/shortname
 * Neighbourhoods for a Sustainable Vancouver/meta/shortname
 * New Democratic Party (Canada)/meta/shortname
 * Non-Partisan Association/meta/shortname
 * Progressive Conservative Party of Canada/meta/shortname
 * Progressive Conservative Party of New Brunswick/meta/shortname
 * Progressive Conservative Party of Newfoundland and Labrador/meta/shortname
 * Social Credit Party of Canada/meta/shortname
 * Vision Vancouver/meta/shortname

I've had 89 of these shortname templates deleted through speedy deletion over the last couple months, but a few deletion requests were declined, so I'm bringing the rest of them here. None of these are being used on any page. All of their functionality can be replicated by Template:Canadian party colour. There is no reason to keep them for subsitution because the contents of the templates are shorter than the template names. There is no reason to keep them for their histories because they have had few-to-no edits and few-to-no mentions on talk pages. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 03:09, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Completely unnecessary as a template or a redirect. The new template handles these functions perfectly. 117Avenue (talk) 04:57, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:57, 18 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. I don't really understand the point of having limited-use templates when we have a much more versatile one.  They are not duplicates of the party colour template, so they don't qualify for speedy.  Nyttend (talk) 14:38, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.