Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 July 2



Template:Passed

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. WOSlinker (talk) 14:40, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Passed
 * Not passed

failed proposal. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 23:56, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Question What was the proposal? If no one answers, consider my vote to be deleted. 184.76.26.102 (talk) 12:27, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Partly sourced articles? Frietjes (talk) 16:21, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * delete Unused; no documentation on intended use. ---— Gadget850 (Ed)  talk 00:27, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Todo-inline

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 02:20, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Todo-inline

unused. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 23:42, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Indexer

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 02:20, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Indexer

given the limited usage and scope, should probably be simply userfied. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 23:11, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:OS coopl

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 02:20, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * OS coopl

unused frontend to gbmappingsmall. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 23:08, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NFL Notes

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 02:21, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * NFL Notes

sparsely used template, which seems to be poor in terms of wp:accessibility and counter to the spirit of WP:COLLAPSE. plus, we have template:abbr for this sort of thing when it actually is just explanation of something which has been abbreviated. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 22:56, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:PSLFfooter

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 02:21, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * PSLFfooter

unused. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 22:52, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:RI villages source
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 02:21, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * RI villages source

unused. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 22:49, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Section headings example
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 02:22, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Section headings example

unused. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 20:53, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Redirect preload
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 02:22, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect preload

why do we need this? 198.102.153.2 (talk) 20:48, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment I assume there's an article wizard out there somewhere that uses this. -- 70.49.127.65 (talk) 03:13, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * It's used at How to make a redirect. 82.132.139.201 (talk) 08:57, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete When you don't create a documentation page, your template gets deleted since no one knows what it's for. Simple as that. Creating the doc page is a 30-second step that could have avoided this discussion, assuming this template is actually used. 184.76.26.102 (talk) 12:26, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment That's a bad idea, in the general case. Lots of old templates have documentation on their talk pages, because doc pages are a newer concept than templates. Lot of helper templates only have documentation on the main template, so you'd break several systems with that kind of blanket deleting. 70.49.127.65 (talk) 04:09, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Books of Torah
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 02:22, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Books of Torah

Redundant to Books of the Bible (footer) and Tanakh OT (sidebar). —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:33, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep as it is useful for and its sub-categories. – Fayenatic  L ondon 18:04, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * delete after replacing with in the categories. Frietjes (talk) 16:55, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Blokhus FC squad
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 02:22, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Blokhus FC squad

Unmaintained since one year and contains almost exclusively red links. Kq-hit (talk) 11:06, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - Template updated on 25th June 2012. --Pixi Uno (talk) 02:50, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. &#9733;&#9734; DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 23:01, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

<hr style="width:55%;" />
 * Delete - not enough bluelinks, NENAN. GiantSnowman 20:30, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 00:38, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

<hr style="width:55%;" />
 * delete, first work on keeping the current squad section up to date, and writing articles about the players. as it stands right now, it only really links about 3 articles, and it's not clear that all of those are valid due to the lack of updates. Frietjes (talk) 21:07, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.