Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 March 8



Template:Afc warning

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete. Original author has requested deletion.--v/r - TP 03:44, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Afc warning

was created for a bot task (Bots/Requests for approval/Snotbot 8) which is withdrawn - so unused and orphaned. mabdul 18:44, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Yup, I created the template and can confirm that it's not going to be used (by me) for anything. &mdash;SW&mdash; babble 18:45, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Maybe - Could we modify it and use it in place of the single line ChzzBot IV comment?  It would definitely draw more attention.  :- ) DCS  21:05, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: Please not! There are submissions (e.g. disambiguation and templates) which simply don't need any references! mabdul 00:20, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Category TOC numerals

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  12:09, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Category TOC numerals

trivial hard-coded instance of category TOC. Should be substituted on existing pages. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 15:18, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
 * SUBSt and delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:44, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Category TOC exists

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Template does not exist. If the template linked contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:51, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Category TOC exists

Unused and unclear purpose. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 13:20, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
 * That's why users have talk pages. Rich Farmbrough, 13:27, 8 March 2012 (UTC).


 * Apologies. I see this has been userfied, so the nom is moot. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 13:36, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Category TOC numeric

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 05:35, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Category TOC numeric

hardcoded instance of category TOC used on a handful of category pages. The code is simple enough to include directly, so recommend substitution. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 12:48, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep, unless you can guarantee no one will ever want to use this template on another category. Rich Farmbrough, 13:29, 8 March 2012 (UTC).


 * They very well may do. however, it is counterproductive to fill category:Wikipedia category table of contents templates with dozens of variants of the same template with different, trivial, flags passed to it. Just transclude category TOC directly and pass the necessary flags to it. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 13:38, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:45, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
 * delete, rarely used, so no reason to keep it around as a separate template. Frietjes (talk) 23:45, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Category year TOC

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  12:09, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Category year TOC

Hardcoded category TOC which isn't actually used on any categories. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 12:37, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:46, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:SubTOC

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  12:09, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
 * SubTOC

Used on a single project page and only a handful of the links are filled in. I've replaced the implementation with a call to CompactTOC8: the single transclusion can now be substituted. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 11:45, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:46, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.