Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 September 6



Template:Flight 29 Down

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 04:23, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Flight 29 Down

connects 3 articles, the rest are section anchors. Frietjes (talk) 23:03, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, not enough articles for a navbox since everything else redirects to a section of the same article. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:08, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. The list of episodes and the director don't need a navbox. They're in the infobox already. Tijfo098 (talk) 09:49, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Quest for Glory series

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 04:27, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Quest for Glory series

This template was prod2-ed with the text "Content has been merged in the Sierra Adventure Games Template. This template serves no further purpose". The prod2 was causing all sorts of funny problems, like showing up on several articles, which were then included in Category:Endorsed proposed deletions. This is a procedural nomination on my behalf; I'm neutral. Tijfo098 (talk) 21:02, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete this now redundant template, as it would be pointless to have two with the same group of links. As stated in PROD, all links are in the bigger Sierra template at this point. —Torchiest talkedits 16:00, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Purely procedural as the merge-out is already complete.  Salvidrim!   15:20, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Sierra Discovery

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 04:29, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Sierra Discovery

This template was prod2-ed with the text "Content has been merged in the Sierra Adventure Games Template. This template serves no further purpose". The prod2 was causing all sorts of funny problems, like showing up on several articles, which were then included in Category:Endorsed proposed deletions. This is a procedural nomination on my behalf; I'm neutral. Tijfo098 (talk) 20:36, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * delete, this has indeed been merged. Frietjes (talk) 15:30, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Republican Presidential Nominees

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 04:29, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Republican Presidential Nominees

orphaned template. 198.102.153.1 (talk) 20:30, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Basically redundant with Republican Party (United States) anyway. --BDD (talk) 20:39, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Tennis shots
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 04:31, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Tennis shots

This template navigates between tennis shots which is redundant to tennis box which includes tennis shots in its navigation and in fact lists more. All articles using this template also use the tennis box nav resulting in over-templating. -- Whpq (talk) 11:25, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Totally redundant (least of all since it is wholly incomplete). Better idea is to link relevant articles to this page. -- Loginnigol (talk) 05:50, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.