Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 August 20



Template:B5Wikia

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 23:16, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * B5Wikia

In my opinion this template have no place here. Your thoughts?--Mishae (talk) 22:10, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Links without content or image
 * 2) Name of a template is not clear


 * Comment what's wrong with it? Why do you need an image? Having an image would violate WP:ICONDECORATION. The name is pretty clear, B5Wikia, where "B5" is a common abbreviation for the topic of the external wiki, and "Wikia" being the wiki hosting service founded by Jimbo Wales. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 09:04, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * You know, I perfectly know by whom it is founded by, so thank you, but that reminder was pointless in this context. As far as the image goes, some Wikipedia templates have images...--Mishae (talk) 19:14, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
 * If they're external link templates (non-WMF), then by WP:ICONDECORATION, the images should be removed. You said the name of the template was unclear, so I wouldn't assume you'd know what Wikia is. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 05:42, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
 * delete, unused and redundant to wikia. Frietjes (talk) 14:54, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant per Frietjes -PC-XT+ 08:26, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Airports in the Gambia

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 04:06, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Airports in the Gambia

One link navbox. — Lfdder (talk) 13:02, 20 August 2013 (UTC)


 * I think we should keep the page - there's a similiar page for a very large number of other countries in the world. At the very least, it allows confirmation of what other airports there are from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Airport_templates Pmbma (talk) 17:05, 20 August 2013 (UTC)Pmbma
 * Delete per the nominator. Sawol (talk) 04:08, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
 * delete as it is unused and the articles are linked through List of airports in the Gambia. Frietjes (talk) 22:21, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Recent visitors

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 23:18, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Recent visitors
 * News1ColPink

Unused template. Unnecessary copy of http://wikiindex.org/Template:Recent_visitors. (And copied without attribution, to boot.) Some of this might be useful on Sites using MediaWiki, but I don't see any purpose here.  — PinkAmpers  &#38;  ( Je vous invite à me parler )  02:08, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * delete (and adding 1colpink template, which is used exclusively by Recent visitors). Frietjes (talk) 19:18, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Cool. Thanks for catching that. Needless to say, I !vote to delete that as well. —  PinkAmpers  &#38;  ( Je vous invite à me parler )  04:18, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:LegendRJL

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 23:19, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * LegendRJL

This template has been deprecated and replaced by jctbtm once that template was updated to take care of the function of this template (and more) per Template talk:LegendRJL. This should be CSD T3-eligible, but I wanted to make sure.

Note for a closing admin: don't delete the template's talk page because it contains discussions that should be retained as a matter of record. Instead, that should be moved to replace Template talk:jctbtm which has no discussion related to either template.  Imzadi 1979  →   01:57, 20 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per above. --Rschen7754 01:59, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant to Jctbtm - Evad37 (talk) 02:34, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per above and good riddance. -happy5214 05:06, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Redundant to the more useful with the |keys= parameter.  T  C  N7 JM  08:12, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Nbound (talk) 09:23, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, deprecated. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 01:24, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: Module:LegendRJL should probably be deleted as well. --Rschen7754 23:18, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:PlayStation 2 nav box

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on Templates for discussion/Log/2013 August 30. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 04:08, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Bo Bice

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 02:54, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Bo Bice

"The Real Thing" and SugarMoney were redirected by me, as I could find no good sourcing for either. This leaves only three albums and one single, putting it short of WP:NENAN. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:33, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Not voting on this, but want to emphasize that WP:NENAN is an essay, not a policy. I advocate applying it with caution. CaseyPenk (talk) 16:04, 20 August 2013 (UTC)


 * keep, has enough links. Frietjes (talk) 20:16, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.