Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 January 29



Template:Descendants of Marie de Medici

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 03:59, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Descendants of Marie de Medici

Unused orphan; rationale for selective choice of her many descendants unclear; issue table at Marie de' Medici is much clearer. Descendants of Henry IV of France is more comprehensive. DrKiernan (talk) 17:38, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * delete, the version in the Ancestry section is better. Frietjes (talk) 16:31, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:FPcandidates

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 03:59, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * FPcandidates

Part of process of making Promotion/Demotion of Portals on Wikipedia a bit simplified. Inspired by suggestion from,. Not widely used per Special:WhatLinksHere. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 15:47, 29 January 2013 (UTC) &mdash; Cirt (talk) 15:47, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * delete Frietjes (talk) 16:31, 6 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Sarasota Dreams story

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 04:53, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Sarasota Dreams story

Unused in the mainspace. It appears to be an infobox for the template creator's personal stories on Wattpad. Axem Titanium (talk) 07:10, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * How did you even discover this? I'm not bothering anyone with this template, as i'm using it for my own personal spaces. Unless there's actually a way to create namespace templates (in which there is no obvious way), This shouldn't break any rules. I'm not letting Big Brother take my personal space. RazorEye ⡭ ₪ ·o' ⍦ ࿂ 09:07, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * You can do something like to transclude pages from your userspace as if they were templates. — This, that, and the other (talk)  11:15, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * User:RazorEyeEdits/Template:Sarasota Dreams story did not work as a working template. RazorEye ⡭ ₪ ·o' ⍦ ࿂ 12:46, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * It will if you move this template to that location. What I would do if I were you would be to move this template to User:RazorEyeEdits/Sarasota infobox and transclude it like so: . — This, that, and the other (talk) 23:29, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Userfy. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:15, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Projectspace is emphatically not provided to users as a personal Web space. Userfying this sends the wrong impression. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 11:34, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, RazorEye, you should look at WP:NOTWEBHOST. — This, that, and the other (talk) 23:29, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment. Why don't you just use Infobox book, which appears to satisfy most of you needs? Secondarywaltz (talk) 23:46, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.