Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 July 16



Template:Armageddon track listing

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:59, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Armageddon track listing

Recent consensus of similar track list templates has questioned the need for such templates when there are already navboxes that provide the same or better navigation (in this case Guy Sebastian singles). See WP:TfD/2013 Feb 26, WP:TfD/2013 March 8, and WP:TfD/2013 April 27. This one only has links to 4 out of 12 songs, and it doesn't add anything to the individual song articles to know that "Used to You" is the 12th track on the album. Interested readers can easily link to Armageddon (Guy Sebastian album) to find that out. Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 23:49, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * delete, redundant to other navigation. Frietjes (talk) 23:17, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Redundant template; only covers a mere one-fourth of the songs listed. Holiday56 (talk) 13:51, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Castlevania chronology

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 21:39, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Castlevania chronology

Template used in only one article, so no need for this template. The text can be moved into the article. The Banner talk 16:12, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * merge with the article, then delete. Frietjes (talk) 23:18, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Ottoman sultan

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, but only after conversion. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 22:01, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Infobox Ottoman sultan

Redundant to one of Infobox noble, Infobox royalty, Infobox monarch, Infobox officeholder, or Infobox person. Only 33 transclusions. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:36, 16 July 2013 (UTC) Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:36, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Being redundant with many other templates, I don't see the need to keep it. --Bright Darkness (talk) 17:59, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. As per above.--Z oupan 04:48, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Oppose. I partially aggree with Andy. There are other infoboxes. But lets look at practical side. This infobox has been used in at least 36 articles. Deleting the infobox means that somebody should work on 36 new infoboxes in a project with very few active participants. That's a loss in time and energy. (Worst still, some articles may lose the infobox forever.) Thus for the sake of completeness lets forget about deleting the infobox. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 18:37, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Caste Groups of India (Kongu Vellalar)

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 22:01, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Caste Groups of India (Kongu Vellalar)

Template was used in just one article - Kongu Vellalar - and I have converted that article to use the more commonly found Template:Infobox caste. Sitush (talk) 11:47, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * delete as redundant. Frietjes (talk) 17:32, 20 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:History of the Iranian peoples

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisting on Templates for discussion/Log/2013 July 27. Plastikspork ―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 22:02, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.