Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2013 May 11



Template:United States Military Aerial Refueling Aircraft

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was moving to List of United States military aerial refueling aircraft. Feel free to nominate it at AfD if its not a notable grouping. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 00:52, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * United States Military Aerial Refueling Aircraft

A navbox that relates user to types of aircraft is not part of the normal aircraft navbox schemes, it has a potential to lead to tens of such navboxes added to each article with no real encyclopedic gain, so not really needed and is covered by navboxes related to aircraft designations. MilborneOne (talk) 19:08, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - the standard for this sort of aviation navbox is 'by manufacturer' or 'by designation', and this fits neither. - The Bushranger One ping only 19:59, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Convert to list which would better indicate dedicated refuelling aircraft and those that are multifunction which are converted to refuel. -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 03:31, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Convert to list, I find this useful, and I think it'd be a waste for it to just be deleted.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 16:37, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Canadian Military Aerial Refueling Aircraft

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 01:06, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Canadian Military Aerial Refueling Aircraft

A navbox that relates user to types of aircraft is not part of the normal aircraft navbox schemes, it has a potential to lead to tens of such navboxes added to each article with no real encyclopedic gain, so not really needed. MilborneOne (talk) 19:03, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - the standard for this sort of aviation navbox is 'by manufacturer' or 'by designation', and this fits neither. - The Bushranger One ping only 19:59, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Convert to list to indicate dedicated refuellers and multifunction craft that have modules that are added when needed. -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 03:32, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Also redundant to Canadian Forces aircraft. Secondarywaltz (talk) 05:17, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

List of second-level domain

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 02:39, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
 * List of second-level domain/ac
 * List of second-level domain/ad
 * List of second-level domain/ae
 * List of second-level domain/af
 * List of second-level domain/ag
 * List of second-level domain/ai
 * List of second-level domain/al
 * List of second-level domain/am
 * List of second-level domain/an
 * List of second-level domain/ao
 * List of second-level domain/aq
 * List of second-level domain/ar
 * List of second-level domain/ar/spe
 * List of second-level domain/arpa
 * List of second-level domain/as
 * List of second-level domain/at
 * List of second-level domain/au
 * List of second-level domain/au/spe
 * List of second-level domain/aw
 * List of second-level domain/ax
 * List of second-level domain/az
 * List of second-level domain/az/test
 * List of second-level domain/ba
 * List of second-level domain/bb
 * List of second-level domain/bd
 * List of second-level domain/be
 * List of second-level domain/bf
 * List of second-level domain/bg
 * List of second-level domain/bh
 * List of second-level domain/bi
 * List of second-level domain/tr
 * List of second-level domain/template

per this discussion, WP is not a DNS server. luckily this project was never completed. Frietjes (talk) 16:19, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete all. Michael! (talk) 17:15, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for doing this. Anyway, yes: these do not have utility beyond potential substitution onto one single article. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 09:16, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Obsolete location map templates

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 21:32, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Location map Afghanistan2
 * Location map Afghanistan2/doc
 * Location map Bangladesh districts
 * Location map Bangladesh districts/doc
 * Location map Basketball League of Serbia
 * Location map Germany2
 * Location map Israel fullyeco
 * Location map Moğolıstan
 * Location map Spain 2
 * Location map Switzerland2
 * Location map Tigris-Euphrates
 * Location map Ukraine norelief
 * Location map USA Wyoming2
 * Location map Wales2
 * Location map 270-0-360-90
 * Location map Scotland mainland
 * Location map USA3
 * Location map England and Wales
 * Location map Europe2
 * Location map Northern Ireland2
 * Location map Scotland2
 * Location map Scotland norelief
 * Location map Sri Lanka2
 * Location map Ukraine1
 * Location map Wyoming2

Reason to delete these templates: #2. "The template is redundant to a better-designed template" and: #3. "The template is not used, either directly or by template substitution (the latter cannot be concluded from the absence of backlinks), and has no likelihood of being used". For instance, Template:Location map Afghanistan2 is obsolete, since Template:Location map Afghanistan serves the same purpose but is of better quality. Michael! (talk) 16:11, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * PS: I could have nominated each of them for CSD T3, which I did with Template:Location map Scotland mainland and Template:Location map USA3 eleven days ago, but this seems to be a faster way. Michael! (talk) 16:14, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * PPS: The last four eight (England and Wales, Europe2, Northern Ireland2, Scotland2, Scotland norelief, Sri Lanka2, Ukraine1, and Wyoming2) are currently redirects without purpose, but they were obsolete, redundant location maps like the others I've nominated here. Michael! (talk) 16:17, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * PPPS: Italy 2 and Italy 3 are two examples of precedents, which were deleted for the same reasons. Michael! (talk) 17:15, 11 May 2013 (UTC)


 * delete, assuming they are all unused. Frietjes (talk) 20:52, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Modern AFV

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted in Templates for discussion/Log/2013 May 19 Plastikspork ―Œ (talk)  21:31, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:BDOM
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 21:27, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
 * BDOM

This template seems only to exist to promote User:Ossip Groth's website; see discussion at Project:Medicine. See also Template:XBDOM. Qwertyus (talk) 11:42, 11 May 2013 (UTC)


 * The script does not promote the external website, it tries to integrate its itellectual content. Anybody out there who thinks that such an external site could be developed intrinsically to wp with the required content stability and ability to run monthly updates on 14.000 (exactly 13.997) topics ?


 * WP does link systematically to external sites e.g. www.google.com, so what is the case against linking with standard wp technology ?


 * --Ossip Groth (talk) 12:03, 11 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete the only editor proposing the use of this template (and adding related links to multiple WP articles) is the author (presumably owner, i.e. WP:COI) of the site (this is one difference from links to other external sites, which enjoy broader support). Linking to the BDOM site would not add to WP content, and this template is not needed.  -- Scray (talk) 12:34, 11 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment Template is currently unused, but a text similar to it has been inserted in many Wikipedia pages about medical topics, often linking to Ossip Groth's website with a pretentious section header of its own (e.g. on YWHAZ. Qwertyus (talk) 13:04, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * We don't use navboxes to link externally, and we frown on accounts with COI inserting links to their own websites into articles. I've no idea what "it tries to integrate its itellectual content" means. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 09:24, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
 * delete Frietjes (talk) 20:37, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:San Jose Radio
<div class="boilerplate vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 03:04, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
 * San Jose Radio

This template overlaps the San Francisco market. Please delete. --Geoffrey100e (talk) 23:57, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete - I agree. San Fran and San Jose are the same market.  --P4403493033940 (talk) 00:18, 12 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. The nominator, Geoffrey100e, is a sockpuppet. The previous !voter, P4403493033940, is also a sockpuppet. This is not a legitimate discussion. Binksternet (talk) 14:04, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.